期刊文献+

新旧课标中高中化学必修课程的难度对比 被引量:2

Comparison of the Difficulty of Senior High School Chemistry Compulsory Courses Under the New and Old Curriculum Standards
原文传递
导出
摘要 2020年教育部颁布了《普通高中化学课程标准(2017年版2020年修订)》,无论从其形式还是内容相比2003年颁布的《普通高中化学课程标准(实验)》都有较大变化。新版课程标准从课程性质、课程目标、课程结构、课程内容等方面进行了全面阐述,从而也带来了课程难度的变化。借助已有的研究方法,以课程广度、课程深度、课程时间为变量,对课程的难度进行定量研究。文中所得出的结论有助于高中教师和研究人员对课程难度进行比较充分、全面的了解,教师从而能够科学、有效地制定教学目标、实施课程内容和开展教学评价。 In 2020,the Ministry of Education promulgated the General High School Chemistry Curriculum Standards(2017Edition Revised in 2020),which has changed significantly in both its form and content compared to the General High School Chemistry Curriculum Standards(Experimental)promulgated in 2003.The new version of the curriculum standard provides a comprehensive description of curriculum nature,curriculum objectives,curriculum structure,curriculum content and so on,which also brings about changes in the difficulty of the curriculum.This paper draws on existing research methods to quantitatively study the difficulty of the curriculum,using curriculum breadth,curriculum depth,and curriculum time as variables.The conclusions drawn in the paper help high school teachers and researchers to have a fuller and more comprehensive understanding of the difficulty of the curriculum,so that they can scientifically and effectively formulate teaching objectives,implement curriculum content and carry out teaching evaluation.
作者 钱胜 郑长龙 QIAN Sheng;ZHENG Chang-Long(Institute of Teacher Education,Northeast Normal University,Changchun 130024,China;Chongqing Academy of Educational Sciences,Chongqing 400015,China;Institute of Chemistry Education,Northeast Normal University,Changchun 130024,China)
出处 《化学教育(中英文)》 CAS 北大核心 2022年第9期1-5,共5页 Chinese Journal of Chemical Education
关键词 高中化学 课程难度 对比分析 课程标准 senior high school chemistry course difficulty comparative analysis curriculum standards
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献18

同被引文献12

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部