新时代开展国家治理与社会行动的共生共在逻辑

The Co-existing Logic of National Governance and Social Action in New Era

20世纪后期,人类社会步入后工业时代,低复杂性和低不确定性的社会情境也逐渐向高复杂性和高不确定性转变。面对这种转变,肇端于资本主义话语体系型构的分析性思维方式,以权利为中心的社会建构方案等一系列工业社会的产物成为新时代发展的阻滞因素,亟须在新时代寻求全新的目标选择和逻辑策略。人的共生共在作为后工业社会的共时性产物,强调注重差异、尊重事实,倡导将共存与合作作为逻辑内核。视相似性思维、合作治理、合作行动、合作制组织和经验理性为共生共在的逻辑内容。这也是摆脱工业社会窠臼的破参之道,为后工业社会的治理实践和社会建构提供目标指南。但需明确的是,人的共生共在目标仍存在人的道德属性与自利属性、民族国家的开放与封闭状态、组织的控制特征与非控制特征、中心国家与边缘国家等一系列话语体系的学术论争。对此,中国的社会科学研究者必须以敏锐的学术意识和高度的理论自觉,在探索未来的道路上为全人类提供中国智慧和中国方案。

In the late 20th century,human society entered the post-industrial era,and the social situation of low complexity and low uncertainty gradually changed to high complexity and high uncertainty.In the face of this transformation,a series of industrial social products,such as“analytical thinking mode,right-centered social construction scheme,elite governance mode,bureaucratic organization form,instrumental rationality and technical rationality”,which originated from the capitalist discourse system,have become the retardation factors of the development of the new era.Therefore,it is urgent to seek new target selection and logical strategy in the new era.As a synchronic product of post-industrial society,the core of“human symbiosis and co-existence”is the logic of“paying attention to difference,respecting facts,emphasizing coexistence and advocating cooperation”.The content is“similarity thinking,cooperative governance,cooperative action,cooperative organization and empirical reason”.This is a way to get rid of the stereotypes of industrial society and provide a clear index and target guide for the governance practice and social construction of post-industrial society.However,it should be made clear that the goal of human co-existence and co-existence is still subject to such realistic situations as“the game between human moral attributes and self-interested attributes,the transition between open and closed state of nation-state,the tug of control characteristics and non-control characteristics of organizations,and the competition of discourse system between central and marginal countries”.In this regard,Chinese social science researchers must calmly respond with keen academic and theoretical sense,seize the opportunity,and provide Chinese wisdom and Chinese solutions to the whole mankind on the road of exploring the future.