期刊文献+

同时性与异时性双侧原发性乳腺癌临床病理分析

Clinicopathological analysis of synchronous and metachronous bilateral primary breast cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨同时性与异时性双侧原发性乳腺癌(bilateral primary breast cancer,BPBC)的临床病理特征、免疫表型及预后差异。方法回顾性分析2006年1月至2020年6月佛山市妇幼保健院经病理确诊的57例BPBC患者的临床病理资料,其中同时性双侧乳腺癌(synchronous bilateral breast cancer,SBBC)20例,异时性双侧乳腺癌(metachronous bilateral breast cancer,MBBC)37例,并对患者进行随访,随访时间截止于2020年12月。比较SBBC与MBBC第一和第二原发癌的组织学类型、T分期、脉管累及、TNM分期、腋窝淋巴结转移和免疫表型差异,并对二者的预后进行分析。结果SBBC与MBBC患者第一和第二原发癌的组织学类型均以非特殊型浸润性癌和导管原位癌最多见,T分期以T1和T2期为主,脉管以未受累及为主,TNM分期以Ⅰ和Ⅱ期为主。MBBC患者第二原发癌的腋窝淋巴结转移率高于SBBC患者(P<0.05)。SBBC患者第一原发癌雌激素受体(estrogen receptor,ER)和人表皮生长因子受体-2(human epidermal growth factor receptor-2,HER2)阳性率均高于MBBC患者第一原发癌,但SBBC患者第二原发癌HER2阳性率低于MBBC患者第二原发癌(均P<0.05)。SBBC患者第一和第二原发癌ER、孕激素受体(progesteronereceptor,PR)和HER2表达一致性均高于MBBC患者(均P<0.05)。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线显示,SBBC与MBBC患者总生存期比较差异无统计学意义(χ^(2)=3.278,P=0.070)。结论SBBC与MBBC患者第一和第二原发癌的临床病理特征及免疫表型有一定差异,MBBC患者两侧肿瘤病灶异质性较大,但二者预后无明显差异。 Objective To investigate the clinicopathological features,immunophenotype and prognosis of synchronous and metachronous bilateral primary breast cancer(BPBC).Methods The clinicopathological data of 57 patients with BPBC who were pathologically confirmed in Foshan Women and Children Hospital from January 2006 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.Twenty cases were synchronous bilateral breast cancer(SBBC)and 37 cases were metachronous bilateral breast cancer(MBBC).The patients were followed up until December 2020.The differences in histological type,T stage,vascular involvement,TNM stage,axillary lymph node metastasis,and immunophenotype of the first and second primary cancers were compared between SBBC and MBBC,and the prognosis was analyzed.Results Non-specific invasive breast carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ were the most common histological types of the first and second primary cancers in patients with SBBC and MBBC.T stage was mainly T1 and T2,the vessels were mainly uninvolved,and TNM stage was mainly stageⅠandⅡ.The axillary lymph node metastasis rate of the second primary cancer in patients with MBBC was higher than that in patients with SBBC(P<0.05).The positive rates of estrogen receptor(ER)and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2(HER2)in the first primary cancer of patients with SBBC were both higher than those of patients with MBBC,but the positive rate of HER2 in the second primary cancer of patients with SBBC was lower than that of patients with MBBC(all P<0.05).The expression consistency of ER,progesterone receptor(PR)and HER2 in the first and second primary cancers of patients with SBBC was higher than that of patients with MBBC(all P<0.05).Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that there was no significant difference in overall survival between patients with SBBC and MBBC(χ^(2)=3.278,P=0.070).Conclusion The clinicopathological features and immunophenotypes of the first and second primary cancers in patients with SBBC and MBBC are different to some extent.The heterogeneity of tumor lesions in patients with MBBC is larger than that of patients with SBBC,but there is no significant difference in prognosis between them.
作者 平静 朱婧 周东华 田杰 Ping Jing;Zhu Jing;Zhou Donghua;Tian Jie(Department of Pathology,Foshan Women and Children Hospital,Foshan 528000,China;Breast Disease Prevention and Control Center,Foshan Women and Children Hospital,Foshan 528000,China)
出处 《实用肿瘤杂志》 CAS 2022年第4期346-351,共6页 Journal of Practical Oncology
关键词 乳腺癌 同时性 异时性 病理学 breast cancer synchronous metachronous pathology
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献27

  • 1张瑰红,施达仁,梁晓曼,侯景辉,康苏娅,朱卫东,李晓兵,邵云,陈丽荣,周燕.显色原位杂交和免疫组织化学检测乳腺癌HER2/neu基因状况和蛋白表达的对照性研究[J].中华病理学杂志,2006,35(10):580-583. 被引量:29
  • 2<乳腺癌HER2检测指南>编写组,霍临明.乳腺癌HER2检测指南[J].中华病理学杂志,2006,35(10):631-633. 被引量:164
  • 3Harris L, Fritsche H, Mennel R, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer [ J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25 (33) :5287-5312.
  • 4Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Schwartz JN, et al. American Society of Chnical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer[ Jl. J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25 ( 1 ) : 118- 145.
  • 5Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG, et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth faetor reeeptor 2 testing in breast eaneer: American Society of Clinical Oneology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update[J]. J Clin Oneol, 2013, 31 (31) :3997-4013.
  • 6Hanna WM, Kwok K. Chromogenic in-situ hybridization:a viable ahernative to fluorescence in-situ hybridization in the HER2 testing algorithm[J]. Mod Pathol, 2006, 19(4) :481-487.
  • 7Park K, Han S, Kim JY, et al. Silver-enhanced in situ hybridization as an alternative to fluorescence in situ hybridization for assaying HER2 amplification in clinical breast cancer [ J ]. J Breast Cancer, 2011, 14(4) :276-282.
  • 8Haines GK 3rd, Wiley E, Susnik B, et al. HER2 in well differentiated breast cancer: is testing necessary? [ J ]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2008, 112(3) :551-556.
  • 9Zhu X, Lu Y, Lu H, et al. Genetic alterations and protein expression of HER2 and chromosome 17 polysomy in breast cancer [J]. Hum Pathol, 2011,42(10) : 1499-1504.
  • 10Marchio C, Lambros MB, Gugliotta P, et al. Does chromosome 17 centromere copy number predict polysomy in breast cancer.9 A fluorescence in situ hybridization and microarray-based CGH analysis[ J]. J Pathol, 2009, 219( 1 ) : 16-24.

共引文献325

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部