慢说“慢”是次生否定词——对《转喻和次生否定词》的再审视

Study on the“慢”Is an Indirect Negator:A Review of Metonymy and Indirect Negators

着眼《转喻和次生否定词》一文里“与压制有关的转喻”章节的论述内容,以“慢X”构式为例,重点分析其中存在的诸多疑虑。研究认为,原文“慢X”构式例探讨主要存在三个问题:一是混淆字词际关系,将假借字“慢”错认成本字“漫”,继而错误判定本义及词义引申序列,望形生义;二是描写与解释主观失实,主观猜测语言事实,误解错用引证文献,规律阐释主观失据;三是转喻发生语义条件难自洽,未能反映典型语例真实语境的语义状况、条件和特点等。总之目前不能确定“慢”是次生否定词,原文“慢X”构式等有关问题有进一步思考的空间。

This paper focuses on the discussion of“metonymy related to repression”in Metonymy and Indirect Negators,and takes“慢X”construction as an example to analyze the existing doubts.It is found that there are three main problems in the study of the construction of“慢X”in the original text.One is to confuse the inter-word relationship,misrecognize the loan character“慢”as the original character“漫”,and then judge the original meaning and extended meaning sequence incorrectly,and then look at the form to generate meaning.Secondly,the description and interpretation of the subjective are not truth,subjectively guess language facts,misunderstand and misuse of cited documents,interpretation of the law of subjective has no reliable evidence.Thirdly,the semantic conditions of metonymy occurrence are difficult to be consistent,and fail to reflect the semantic conditions and characteristics of the real context of typical examples.In a word,it is hard to judge“慢X”is an indirect negator and the problems related to the“慢X”construction need further consideration.