期刊文献+

生态环境跨区域司法保护研究——以祁连山国家公园为例 被引量:8

Research on Cross-Regional Judicial Protection of Ecological Environment——Taking Qilian Mountain National Park as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 环境资源案件具有一定的复杂性和跨区域性,加强生态环境保护的整体性和系统性,除了完善跨区域立法及建立健全跨区域执法协调机制外,如何突破行政区划限制,构建有效的生态环境跨区域司法保护也是生态环境整体保护的重要内容。本文从跨区域司法的视角,对祁连山国家公园生态环境跨区域司法保护中存在的主要问题进行分析,探讨了跨区域司法保护具体制度的构建,为实现祁连山国家公园生态环境的完整性和原真性保护提供思路和建议。 Environmental resource cases are complex and cross-regional.To strengthen the integrity and systematicness of ecological environment protection,in addition to improving cross-regional legislation and establishing and perfecting cross-regional law enforcement coordination mechanism,how to break through the restrictions of administrative divisions and build effective cross-regional judicial protection of ecological environment is also an important content of the overall ecological environment protection.From the perspective of cross-regional justice,this paper analyzes the major problems existing in the cross-regional judicial protection of the ecological environment of Qilian Mountain National Park,discusses the construction of the specific system of cross-regional judicial protectiom,and provides ideas and suggestions for realizing the integrity and authenticity protection of the ecological environment of Qilian Mountain National Park.
作者 马芳 Ma Fang
出处 《青海民族大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第2期124-130,共7页 Journal of Qinghai Minzu University:Social Sciences
基金 国家社会科学基金项目“祁连山国家公园脆弱生态环境保护与修复的跨区域法治协调机制研究”(项目编号:19BFX181) 青藏高原环境与资源法学研究基地(国家民委人文社科重点研究基地)2022年度阶段性研究成果。
关键词 生态环境 跨区域 司法保护 祁连山国家公园 Ecological Environment Cross-Region Judicial Protection Qilian Mountain National Park
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献47

  • 1苏力.法律活动专门化的法律社会学思考[J].中国社会科学,1994(6):117-131. 被引量:93
  • 2最高人民法院.《最高人民法院关于全面加强环境资源审判工作为推进生态文明建设提供有力司法保障的意见》,2014年6月19日,http.//www.chinacourt.org/law/detail/2014/06/id/147914.shtml.
  • 3George Pring ,Catherine Pring, Increase In Environmental Courts And Tribunals Prompts New Global Institute. Journal Of Court Innovation, 2010,3(1).11 -21.
  • 4Hon. Justice Brian J Preston, Characteristics of successful environmental courts and tribunals, Presentation to the Eco Forum Global Annual Conference Guiyang 2013. The 3rd Environmental Justice Seminar, 2013.
  • 5Ulf Bjallas. Experience of Sweden' s Environmental Courts, Journal of Court - 1 Innovation, Volume 3, winter 2010.
  • 6胡斌.《国外环境法院初探》,http.//wwW.xchen.com.cn/lylw/hjflw/648518.html.
  • 7Malcolm Grant, The Environmental Court Project, Final Report, Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions, 2000.
  • 8谷望舒,杨蕾.《国外环境法院是如何运作的》,《法治周末》,2014年6月10日,http.//www.1egalweekly.cn/index.php/Index/article/id/5275.
  • 9蔡守秋,文黎照.印度《2010年国家绿色法庭法》评介,《法学杂志》2013年第11期,http.//www.civillaw.com.cn/article/default.asp?id=62448.
  • 10Praveen Bhargav, Everything you need to know about the National Green Tribunal (NGT), http.//www, conservationindia, org/resources/ngt.

共引文献56

引证文献8

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部