基于事件的多重对应对语义异指的解释

An Explanation of Form-meaning Mismatch from the Perspective of Event-based Multiple Correspondences

本文通过分析异指定中结构发现,认知配价关系直接把异指单位整合的动力归因于词汇层面的百科语义对应关系,这使得其对异指现象的解释力不足。因此本文提出,应构建基于事件的多层级对应关系,以便为异指结构提供更具心理现实性的解释。据此,语义同指和语义异指的区分在于前者仅包含一层语义对应关系,而后者包含多重语义对应关系,赋予异指结构更丰富的内涵。语义异指的产生源于说话人试图突显事件层面的语义对应,而使词汇层面的常规对应关系背景化。词汇层面的对应客观存在,是支撑事件层面对应的基石和前提,而事件层面的对应则更能体现说话人的主观识解。

Based on the analysis of attributive-head mismatch structures, the present study points out that the Valence Relation of cognitive grammar directly attributes the integration of mismatch units to the encyclopedic meaning of lexicon, which renders its relevant explanation inadequate. We propose that a multiple correspondence model based on event should be established to afford a more psychologically plausible account for form-meaning mismatch structures. Under this analysis, the essential difference between form-meaning uniformity and mismatch is that the latter embodies more layers of semantic correspondence relations, and thus encompasses a richer body of meaning. The speaker adopts form-meaning mismatch to profile the correspondence at the event level, and background the lexical level correspondence. While the lexical correspondence exists objectively and supports the event level correspondence, the event level correspondence can better express the subjective construal of the speaker.