期刊文献+

ACS患者PCI术后血清S1P、补体C3水平及其预后评估的价值分析 被引量:3

Levels of serum sphingosine 1-phosphate and third component of complement and their value in prognosis reviewing in patients with acute coronary syndrome after PCI
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的检测急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术后血清1-磷酸鞘氨醇(S1P)、补体第三组分(C3)水平,探讨二者与患者预后的关系。方法选取2017年1月至2019年9月于长沙市中心医院收治的首次接受PCI的ACS患者100例(ACS组)为研究对象,随访6个月后,按照是否发生心血管事件分为心血管事件组21例和无心血管事件组79例;选取同时期本院健康体检者100例为对照组。收集所有患者既往病史、血常规(中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞之比)及生化检测结果并测定体质指数(BMI);采用酶联免疫吸附(ELISA)法检测血清中S1P、补体C3水平。Pearson法分析S1P、补体C3与血脂的相关性。采用受试者工作曲线(ROC)分析血清S1P、补体C3及联合检测对ACS患者PCI术后预后不良预测价值。采用COX法分析影响ACS患者PCI术后不良预后的因素。结果与对照组相比,ACS组患者血清S1P、补体C3水平较高(P<0.05)。与无心血管事件组相比,心血管事件组患者血清中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、三酰甘油(TG)、总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、S1P及补体C3水平较高(P<0.05),高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)水平较低(P<0.05)。S1P与LDL-C、TC、TG呈正相关(P<0.05),与HDL-C呈负相关(P<0.05);补体C3与LDL-C、TC、TG呈正相关(P<0.05),与HDL-C呈负相关(P<0.05),S1P、补体C3联合对ACS患者PCI术后不良预后诊断的AUC为0.853,灵敏度为87.30%,特异度为76.20%。结论ACS患者PCI术后血清S1P、补体C3水平上调,预示患者预后不良,二者联合诊断价值更佳。 Objective To detect the levels of sphingosine 1-phosphate(S1P)and third component of complement(complement C3)and discuss the relationship among them and prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome(ACS)after percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI).Methods ACS patients undergone PCI(n=100)were chosen into ACS group from Central Hospital of Changsha City from Jan.2017 to Sept.2019.After followed up for 6 months,ACS group was divided,according to whether or not incidence of cardiovascular events,into cardiovascular events group(n=21)and non-cardiovascular events group(n=79).At the same time healthy controls were chosen into control group(n=100).The patients’data of previous medical history,results of blood routine examinations[neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio(NLR)]and biochemical detection,and body mass index(BMI)were collected.The levels of S1P and complement C3 were detected by using ELISA.The correlation among S1P,complement C3 and blood fat was analyzed by using Pearson method.The predictive value of S1P,complement C3 and combined detection of S1P and complement C3 to poor prognosis was detected by using receiver operating curve(ROC)in ACS patients after PCI.The factors of poor prognosis were analyzed by using COX in ACS patients after PCI.Results The levels of S1P and complement C3 were higher in ACS group than those in control group(P<0.05).Compared with non-cardiovascular events group,the levels of NLR,triglyceride(TG),total cholesterol(TC),low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol(LDL-C),S1P and complement C3 were higher(P<0.05)and level of high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol(HDL-C)was lower(P<0.05)in cardiovascular events group.S1P was positively correlated to LDL-C,TC and TG(P<0.05)and negatively correlated to HDL-C(P<0.05).Complement C3 was positively correlated to LDL-C,TC and TG(P<0.05)and negatively correlated to HDL-C(P<0.05).The AUC of combined detection of S1P and complement C3 was 0.853,sensitivity was 87.30%and specificity was 76.20%in diagnosis of poor prognosis in ACS patients after PCI.Conclusion The up-regulations of S1P and complement C3 levels predict poor prognosis in ACS patients after PCI,and combined detection of S1P and complement C3 have higher diagnostic value.
作者 李泽华 蒋路平 叶国红 龙骁 吴鹏翠 Li Zehua;Jiang Luping;Ye Guohong;Long Xiao;Wu Pengcui(不详;Department of Cardiology,Central Hospital of Changsha City,Changsha 410004,China)
出处 《中国循证心血管医学杂志》 2022年第6期689-692,共4页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Cardiovascular Medicine
基金 湖南省卫生健康委科技计划课题项目(B20182018)。
关键词 急性冠脉综合征 1-磷酸鞘氨醇 补体第三组分 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 Acute coronary syndrome Sphingosine 1-phosphate Third component of complement Percutaneous coronary intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献108

  • 1刘威,康林,曹贵方,白淑玲.血清补体C3水平与冠状动脉病变的严重程度[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2007,11(12):2348-2350. 被引量:3
  • 2Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [J]. Eur Heart J, 2016, 37 (3) : 267-315. DOI: 10. 1016/j. rec. 2015. 10. 009.
  • 3Nabi F, Chang SM, Xu J, et al. Assessing risk in acute chest pain : The value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients admitted through the emergency department [ J]. J Nucl Cardiol, 2012, 19 (2): 233-243. DOI: 10. 1007/s12350-011-9484-7.
  • 4Shah BN, Balaji G, Alhajiri A, et al. Incremental diagnostic and prognostic value of contemporary stress echocardiography in a chest pain unit: mortality and morbidity outcomes from a real-world setting [J]. Cardiovasc Imaging, 2013, 6 (2): 202-209. DOI: 10. ll61/CIRCIMAGING. 112. 980797.
  • 5Huhen E, Pickett C, Bittencourt MS, et al. Outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography in theemergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials [J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2013, 61 (8): 880- 892. DOI: 10. 1016/j. jacc. 2009. 02. 008.
  • 6Mueller C, Giannitsis E, Christ M, et al. Multicenter evaluation of a 0-hour/l-hour algorithm in the diagnosis ofmyocardial infarction with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [ J ]. Ann Emerg Med, 2016, pii: S0196-0644 (15) 01501-2. DOI: 10. 1016/j. annemergrned. 2015. 11. 013.
  • 7Reichlin T, Schindler C, Drexler B, et al. One-hour rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [J]. Arch Intern Med, 2012, 172 (16) : 1211-1218. DOI: 10. 1001/archintemmed. 2012. 3698.
  • 8Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation [J]. Eur Heart J, 2012, 33 (20) : 2569-2619. DOI: 10. 1093/eurheartj/ehs215.
  • 9Fox KA, Fitzgerald G, Puymirat E, et al. Should patients with acute coronary disease be stratified for management according to their risk Derivation, external validation and outcomes using the updated GRACE risk score [J]. BMJ Open, 2014, 4 (2): e4425. DOI: 10. 1136/bmjopen-2013-O04425.
  • 10Abu-Assi E, Raposeiras-Roubin S, Iear P, et al. Comparing the predictive validity of three contemporary bleeding risk scores in acute coronary syndrome [J]. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care, 2012, 1 (3): 222-231. DOI: 10. 1177/2048872612453924.

共引文献671

同被引文献53

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部