期刊文献+

基于双反馈机制的社会网络群决策共识模型研究 被引量:3

Research on Social Network Group Decision Making Consensus Model Based on Two-fold Feedback Mechanism
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文构建了双反馈机制的社会网络群决策共识框架,在此基础上建立了基于双反馈机制的共识模型。首先,建立了同步运行的权重重置反馈机制和方案属性值调整反馈机制,前者通过调整决策者信任积分重置决策者权重,后者利用低优势度方案的属性值适度调整来改变决策者评价意见;其次,通过决策者二元语义评价矩阵,集结个体评价矩阵以测度各决策者共识度;最后,通过某省PPP试点项目方案选择算例,验证了所提共识模型的可行性与有效性。 A consensus framework of social network group decision making based on two-fold feedback mechanism is constructed, and on this basis, a consensus model based on two-fold feedback mechanism is established. Firstly, a synchronous weight feedback mechanism and an alternative attribute values feedback mechanism are established, in which the dynamic weight feedback mechanism uses the trust score of decision makers to reset the weights of decision makers, and the alternative attribute values feedback mechanism changes the evaluation of the decision makers by adjusting the alternative attribute value with low alternative dominance degree. Secondly, the decision maker’s evaluation matrix is reconstructed, the consensus degree is calculated by aggregating individual evaluation matrices. Finally, the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed consensus model are verified by an example of PPP pilot project.
作者 顾月琴 郝湉湉 程发新 GU Yue-qin;HAO Tian-tian;CHENG Fa-xin(School of Management,Jiangsu University,Zhenjiang 212013,China;Nanrui Subdistrict Office,Yijiang District,Wuhu 241000,China)
出处 《模糊系统与数学》 北大核心 2022年第2期60-71,共12页 Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71673118 71901058)。
关键词 双反馈机制 共识模型 信任积分调整 方案优势度 备选方案属性值 Two-fold Feedback Mechanism Consensus Model Trust Score Adjustment Alternative Dominance Degree Alternative Attribute Value
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献42

  • 1彭怡,胡杨.考虑群体一致性的动态群体决策方法[J].运筹与管理,2004,13(4):69-72. 被引量:4
  • 2姜艳萍,樊治平.基于不同粒度语言判断矩阵的群决策方法[J].系统工程学报,2006,21(3):249-253. 被引量:46
  • 3Yager R R. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making [J]. IEEE Trans on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1988, 18 (1) :183-190.
  • 4Yager R R, Kacprzyk J. The Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators: Theory and Application [M]. Norwell : Kluwer, 1997.
  • 5Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E. Aggregation operators for linguistic weighted information[J]. IEEE Trans on Systems, Man and Cybernetics ,1997 , 27 ( 5 ) : 646-656.
  • 6Mitchell H B, Schaefer P A. Multiple priorities in an induced ordered weighted averaging operator[J]. Int J of Intelligent Systems, 2000,15 (2): 317-327.
  • 7Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E. Linguistic decision analysis : Steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000,115(1), 67-82.
  • 8Bordogna G, Fedrizzi M, Pasi G. A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators [J]. 1EEE Trans on Systems, Man and Cybernetics,1997, 27(1): 126-132.
  • 9Herrera F, Martinez L. A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words [J]. IEEE Trans on Fuzzy Systems,2000,8(6):746-752.
  • 10Herrera F, Martinez L. A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranularity hierarchical linguistic contexts in multiexpert decision-making [J].IEEE Trans on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2001,31(2) .227-234.

共引文献80

同被引文献64

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部