期刊文献+

基于证据的职业技能评价方法有效性框架构建 被引量:7

Construction of Evidence-based Validity Framework for Vocational Competence Evaluation Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 借鉴语言测试的AUA测试框架,以信度理论和整体效度观为理论基础,运用修正式德尔菲法构建了包括4项一级指标、11项二级指标和33项三级指标的职业技能评价方法有效性框架。研究发现:信度、效度是职业技能评价方法在评价技术上最重要的质量标准;职业技能评价方法的有效性评价不仅关注评价工具本身的有效性,还注重评价及其结果使用的有效性;对职业技能评价方法的有效性评价是基于证据的有效性论证;所构建的有效性框架具有良好的应用价值和可推广性。在设计职业技能评价方法时,建议将信度和效度理论作为理论基础,关注评价及其结果的使用对考生、院校和企业的影响,注重利益相关者的参与,关注评价的公平性。 The study draws on the Assessment Use Argument framework of language testing,takes reliability and unified validity as the theoretical basis,and uses the modified Delphi method to construct a validity framework for vocational competence evaluation methods,and the results found that:reliability and validity are the most important quality standards of vocational competence evaluation methods at the technical level;the validity evaluation of vocational competence evaluation method not only pays attention to the validity of the evaluation tool itself,but also pays attention to the evaluation of the validity of evaluation results and their use;the validity evaluation of vocational competence evaluation method is based on evidence-based validity argument;the constructed validity framework has good application value and generalizability.It is suggested that,the reliability and validity theory should be used as the theoretical basis when designing vocational competence evaluation methods,the impact of the use of evaluation and its results on candidates,colleges and enterprises should be paid attention to,the participation of stakeholders and the fairness of the evaluation should be focused on when designing the evaluation method.
作者 黄方慧 赵志群 Huang Fanghui;Zhao Zhiqun(of China Fire and Rescue Institute,Beijing 102202;of Beijing Normal University)
出处 《职业技术教育》 北大核心 2022年第13期14-19,共6页 Vocational and Technical Education
基金 北京市教育科学“十三五”规划2020年优先关注课题“‘1+X’证书制度建设中技能评价方法研究”(BDEA2020009) 教育部1+X证书制度2020年度专项课题“职业技能等级证书考核模型与评价技术研究”,主持人:赵志群。
关键词 职业技能评价 职业教育 有效性框架 证据 修正式德尔菲法 competence evaluation vocational education validity framework evidence modified delphi method
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献36

  • 1陈玉华 ,吕光军 .我国五年制高职教育的回顾与展望[J].教育与职业,2005(36):6-7. 被引量:11
  • 2俎媛媛.美国真实性学生评价及其启示[J].教育发展研究,2007,27(03B):62-66. 被引量:37
  • 3盛晓明,吴彩强.行动、因果关系和自我——塞尔行动哲学述评[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2007,37(3):143-150. 被引量:6
  • 4邓波,贺凯.试论科学知识、技术知识与工程知识[J].自然辩证法研究,2007,23(10):41-46. 被引量:78
  • 5Alderson, J. C. & C. Clapham. Applied linguistics and language testing: A case study of the ELTS test [ R ]. Paper presented at the BAAL conference, Lancaster, 1989.
  • 6American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association & National Council on Meas- urement in Education. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing ( 6th ed. ) [ M ]. Washington, DC : American Educational Research Association, 1999.
  • 7Coniam, D. Investigating the quality of teacher-produced tests for EFL students and the impact of training in test development principles on improving test quality[ J]. SYSTEM, 2009, 37 (2) :231.
  • 8Educational Testing Service. GRE Test Scores [ EB/OL]. 2012.8.5. http ://www. ets. org/gre. 2012.
  • 9Educational Testing Service. Test of English as a Foreign Language [EB/OL]. 2011.4.1 http://www. ets. org/toefl/ibt/about. 2011.
  • 10Hambrick, D.Z. & C. Chabris. Yes, IQ Really Matters [ N/OL]. Washington Post011.4. 14 www. slate. com. 2014.

共引文献218

同被引文献66

引证文献7

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部