1Elias, J. (1996). Book Review: Dorothy Nelkin. Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and TechnoLogy. Journal of Public Health Policy, 17(4): 501-504.
2Murcott, T. H. L. &Williams, A. (2012). The Challenges for science journalism in the UK. Progress in Physical Geography. 37(2): 152-160.
3Metcalfe, J. & Gascoigne, T. (1995). Science journalism in Australia. Public Understanding of Science. 4:411-428.
4Pitrelli, N.(2OlO).Science Journalism to Facea Demand for Renewal. Journal of Science Communication. 9(4): 1-2.
5Kennedy, D. (2010). The future of science news. Daedalus. 139(2): 57-67.
6Mooney, C. (2008). The science writer' s lament: The missing section in your daily paper. In: Science Progress Biog. Available at: http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/lO/the-science-writers-lament.
7Russell, C. (2006). Covering controversial science: Improving reporting on science and public policy. Available at: http://beIfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/pubicatin/18442/cvering-cntrversial-sci- ence.html?breadcrumb= % 2Fexperts %2F944% 2Fcristine_russell%3Fpage %3D2.
8Williams, A. & Clifford. S. (2010). Mapping the field: A political economic account of specialist science news journalism in the UK national media. Available at: http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/jmec/research/researchgrups/riskscienceandheath/fundedprjects/mappingscience.htm.
9Allan, S. (2009). The future of science journalism. Journalism. 10(3): 280-282.
