期刊文献+

基于熵值法的碳配额优化电量灰色预测模型 被引量:5

Grey Prediction Model of Optimal Electricity Quantity of Carbon Quota Based on Entropy Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于灰色预测理论基础,针对电量预测与碳减排目标设定难以结合的问题,从减排责任、减排能力与减排潜力三个方向入手,提出一种基于熵值法的碳配额模型,并且通过灰色预测的方法解决历史数据少的问题从而实现电量预测,最后通过综合考量碳配额在电力预测中的影响程度,提出了一种基于碳配额的优化灰色预测模型,并结合实例进行分析,通过后验差检验保证了模型的准确性,结果表明引入碳配额分配方式后的灰色模型更具有现实意义,有助于指导地区制定能源政策,并在兼顾地区历史发展水平与GDP水平的同时完善碳配额制度。 Based on the gray prediction theory,aiming at the problem that it is difficult to combine electricity prediction with carbon emission reduction target setting,a carbon quota model based on entropy method was put forward,starting from three directions:emission reduction responsibility,emission reduction capacity and emission reduction potential,and the problem of lack of historical data was solved through the gray prediction method so as to achieve electricity prediction,and finally by comprehensively considering the influence of carbon quota in power forecasting,an optimized gray prediction model based on carbon quota was obtained,and through analyzing with an example,and the accuracy of the model was ensured through posterior error test.The results show that the gray model after introducing carbon quota allocation mode is of more practical significance,which is helpful to guide the formulation of regional energy policy,and improve the carbon quota system while taking into account the regional historical development level and GDP level.
作者 肖勇 裴飞 胡伟 王函韵 XIAO Yong;PEI Fei;HU Wei;WANG Han-yun(School of Economics and Management, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai 200090, China;State Grid Zhejiang Electric Power Co.Ltd., Huzhou Power Supply Company, Huzhou 313099, China)
出处 《科学技术与工程》 北大核心 2022年第19期8355-8362,共8页 Science Technology and Engineering
基金 国家社会科学基金(19BGL003)。
关键词 熵值法 电量预测 灰色预测 碳配额 entropy method electric quantity prediction grey prediction carbon quotas
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献108

  • 1史丹,薛钦源.中国一次能源安全影响因素、评价与展望[J].经济纵横,2021(1):31-45. 被引量:23
  • 2Burtraw D., Palmer K., Bharvirkar R. The Effect of Allowance Allocation on the Cost of Carbon Emission Trading[DB/OL]. RFF Discussion Papers dp-01-30, http://rff.org/RFF/Documents/RFF-DP-01-30.pdf, 2001-08.
  • 3Cramton P., Kerr S. Tradeable Carbon Permit Auctions: How and Why to Auction Not Grandfather[J]. Energy Policy, 2002,30(4):333- 345.
  • 4Edwards T. H., Hutton J. P. Allocation of Carbon Permits within a Country: A General Equilibrium Analysis of the United King- dom[J]. Energy Economics, 2001,23(4):371-386.
  • 5Fischer C., Alan K. F. Output-Based Allocation of Emissions Permits for Mitigating Tax and Trade Interactions[J]. Land Economics, 2007,83(4):575-599.
  • 6Jensen J., Rasmussen T. N. Allocation of CO2 Emission Permits: A General Equilibrium Analysis of Policy Instruments[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2000,40(2): 111-136.
  • 7Dinan T., Rogers D. L. Distributional Effects of Carbon Allowance Trading: How Government Decisions Determine Winners and Losers[J]. National Tax Journal, 2002,55(2):199-221.
  • 8Ellerman A. D., Wing I. S. Absolute versus Intensity-based Emissions Caps[J]. Climate Policy, 2003,3(S2):7-20.
  • 9Kuik O., Mulder M. Emissions Trading and Competitiveness: Pros and Cons of Relative and Absolute Schemes[J]. Energy Policy,2004,32(6):737-745.
  • 10Pizer W. The Case for Intensity Targets[DB/OL]. RFF Discussion Paper 05-02, http://wwwaforg/Documents/RFF-DP-05-02.pdtf. 2005-01.

共引文献181

同被引文献50

引证文献5

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部