期刊文献+

基于认知-态度-行为意愿理论的仿冒服装购买意愿的影响因素 被引量:4

Influencing factors of counterfeit clothing purchase intention based on cognitive-attitudinal-behavioral intention theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了研究仿冒服装购买意愿的影响因素,基于“认知-态度-行为意愿”理论逻辑,首先探究产品认知、消费者态度与仿冒服装购买意愿间的影响关系,然后加入金钱崇拜与道德判断两个因素,探究二者在此逻辑关系中所起到的影响作用。结果表明:产品认知的外观、体验、功能三个维度均能正向影响象征价值及购买意愿、负向影响社会风险;消费者态度中的象征价值正向影响购买意愿,社会风险负向影响购买意愿;并且产品认知的三个维度均能通过象征价值正向影响购买意愿,通过社会风险负向影响购买意愿;金钱崇拜正向影响购买意愿,道德判断负向影响购买意愿;而金钱崇拜在产品认知的三个维度与象征价值间并不起到正向的调节作用,道德判断在产品认知的三个维度与社会风险间也不起到正向的调节作用。最后,根据得到的研究结果,提出相应的对策建议。 In order to study the factors influencing counterfeit clothing purchase intention,this article first explores the relationship among product cognition,consumers'attitudes and willingness to purchase counterfeit clothing,and then takes two other factors-money worship and moral judgment-into consideration to further explore the influence of these two factors in this logical framework based on the theoretical logic of"cognitive-attitudinal-behavioral intention".The results show that the three dimensions of product perception:appearance,experience and function have a positive influence on symbolic value and purchase intention and a negative influence on social risk;the symbolic value in consumers'attitudes positively influences while social risk negatively influences purchase intention;all the three dimensions of product perception can positively influence purchase intention through symbolic value,and negatively influence purchase intention through social risk;money worship positively influences while moral judgment negatively influences purchase intention.Nevertheless,money worship does not play a positive moderating role between the three dimensions of product perception and symbolic value,and moral judgment does not play a positive moderating role between the three dimensions of product perception and social risk.Finally,corresponding countermeasures are suggested based on the research results obtained.
作者 吴镓斌 曲洪建 WU Jiabin;QU Hongjian(College of Textile and Clothing,Shanghai University of Engineering Science,Shanghai 201600,China)
出处 《现代纺织技术》 北大核心 2022年第4期230-240,共11页 Advanced Textile Technology
关键词 产品认知 象征价值 社会风险 金钱崇拜 道德判断 仿冒服装 product cognition symbolic value social risk money worship moral judgment counterfeit clothing
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献59

  • 1Ang S.H.,Cheng P.S.,Lim E.,Tambyah S.K.,2001.Spot the Difference:Consumer Responses towards Counterfeits[J].Journal of Consumer Marketing,18(3):219-235.
  • 2Bamberg Sebastian.,Ajzen Icek.,Schmidt Peter.,2003.Choice of Travel Mode in the Theory of Planned Behavior:The Roles of Past Behavior,Habit,and Reasoned Action[J].Basic and Applied Social Psychology,25(3):175-187.
  • 3BBC.2007.UK Consumers Happy to Own Fakes[EB/OL].Retrieved from:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6910710.stm.
  • 4Behar R.,2000.Beijing's Phony War on Fakes[J].Fortune(Europe),142(10):98-110.
  • 5Berry,J.W.,Y.H.Poortinga,M.H.Segall,P.R.Dasen.Cross-Cultural Psychology:Research and Applications[M].Cambridge University Press,Cambridge,1992.
  • 6Bian X.,Moutinho L.,2011.Counterfeits and Branded Products:Effects of Counterfeit Ownership[J].Journal of Product&Brand Management,20(5):379-393.
  • 7Bian X.,Veloutsou C.,2007.Consumers'Attitudes Regarding Nondeceptive Counterfeit Brands in the UK and China[J].Journal of Brand Management,14(3):211-222.
  • 8Bloch P.H.,Bush R.F.,1993.Campbell L.Consumer“Accomplices”in Product Counterfeiting[J].Journal of Consumer Marketing,10(4):27-36.
  • 9Chan H.,Wan L.C.,Sin L.Y.M.,2009.The Contrasting Effects of Culture on Consumer Tolerance:Interpersonal Face and Impersonal Fate[J].Journal of Consumer Research,36(2):292-304.
  • 10Chen Zhimin.,Yu Liyun,Murray Richard,2013.Brand Protection and Counterfeiting in the United Kingdom and China[J].International Journal of Management Cases,15(4):373-385.

共引文献4

同被引文献36

引证文献4

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部