理气为一与心性格物:罗钦顺诠释经典的两个向度

Li Qi is One and Heart Character:Two Dimensions of Luo Qinshun’s Interpretation of Classics

自黄宗羲在《明儒学案》中评价罗钦顺哲学思想存在理气论与心性论之间的矛盾后,该说法似成定论,在学术界广泛流行开来。但从经典诠释视角分析罗氏思想,可见其关于理气与心性问题的讨论实则并无逻辑冲突之处。罗钦顺以诠释经典的方式,修正理学、驳斥禅学与心学,开明代理学发展新气象。他以“理气为一”命题解《易》,以心性思辨解《大学》之“格物”,建构出一套独具特色的解经思路。更重要的是,罗钦顺对理气、心性等问题的思考关键点乃是“统一性”,而非纠缠于谁为“第一性”。

Since Huang Zongxi evaluated the contradiction between the theory of Li Qi and the theory of Xinxing in Luo Qinshun’s philosophical thought in the Ming Ru Xue An,this argument seems to be widely popular in academia.However,analyzing the thought from the perspective of classic interpretation shows that his discussion on the issue of Li Qi and Xinxing has no logical conflict.Luo Qinshun revises Neo-Confucianism and refutes Zen and Mind by interpreting classics,and enlightened agency studies develop a new atmosphere.He interpreted the Yi with the proposition“Li Qi is one”,distinguished the“gewu”of Da Xue with mind and thought,and constructed a set of unique interpretation ideas.More importantly,it clearly shows that the key point of his thinking on issues such as Qi and Xinxing is“unity”,rather than being entangled with the most“primary nature”.