期刊文献+

机身壁板剪切工程算法及试验验证

Engineering Algorithm and Test Verification of Fuselage Panel Subjected to Shear Load
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文针对机身壁板中蒙皮和长桁布置结构优化问题,考虑蒙皮厚度、蒙皮曲率、长桁形式以及长桁间距对机身壁板剪切稳定性的影响,分别设计加工了3类不同蒙皮曲率、宽度的试件和试验装置,并完成验证试验。应用工程算法对机身壁板进行计算,并与试验结果进行对比,结果表明,工程算法和验证试验结果吻合较好,蒙皮曲率、长桁结构形式和长桁间距对机身壁板剪切屈曲有一定的影响,蒙皮厚度对机身壁板剪切屈曲有较大的影响。 This paper focuses on the structure optimization of skin and truss layout in fuselage panel.Considering the influence of skin thickness,skin curvature,truss form and truss spacing on the shear stability of fuselage panel,three types of specimens and test devices with different skin curvature and width are designed and manufactured respectively,and the verification test is completed.The engineering algorithm is used to calculate the fuselage panel,and the calculation results are compared with the test results.The results show that the engineering algorithm is in good agreement with the verification test results.The skin curvature,truss structure and truss spacing have a certain influence on the shear buckling of fuselage panel,and the skin thickness has a great influence on the shear buckling of fuselage panel.
作者 成李南 赵少杰 李新祥 程立平 迟坚 Cheng Linan;Zhao Shaojie;Li Xinxiang;Cheng Liping;Chi Jian(Aeronautics Science and Technology Key Laboratory of Full Scale Aircraft Structure and Fatigue,Aircraft Strength Research Institute of China,Xi'an 710065,Shaanxi,China;AVIC the First Institute,Xi'an 710089,Shaanxi,China)
出处 《工程与试验》 2022年第2期59-62,共4页 Engineering and Test
关键词 机身壁板 工程算法 剪切应力 结构优化 fuselage panel engineering algorithm shear stress structure optimization
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献24

  • 1白杰,郭沛欣,张景新.铝锂合金机身壁板抗压能力对比[J].航空制造技术,2012,55(10):78-79. 被引量:4
  • 2中国航空材料手册编辑委员会.中国航空材料手册(3)[M].北京:中国标准出版社,1989:540,591.
  • 3Pettit R G, Wang J, Toh C. Validated feasibility study of integrally stiffened metallic fuselage panels for reducing manufacturing costs [R]. NASA/CR-2000-209342, 2000.
  • 4Michael P N, James H S. The NASA monographs on shell stability design recommendations [R]. NASA/TP-1998-206290, 1998.
  • 5Munroe J, Wilkins K, Gruber M. Integral airframe structures-validated feasibility study of integrally stiffened metallic fuselage panels for reducing manufacturing costs[R]. NASA/CR-2000-209337, 2000.
  • 6Gruber M L, Mazur C J, Wilkins K E. Investigation of fuselage structure subject to widespread fatigue damage[R]. DOT/FAA/AR-95/47, 1995.
  • 7Marshall R, Richard D Y. Structural stability of a stiffened aluminum fuselage panel subjected to combined mechanical and internal pressure loads [R]. AIAA 2003-1423,2003.
  • 8Paul K, James P, Ross L. A summary of diagonal tension Part Ⅰ: methods of analysis[R]. NACA-TN- 2661, 1952.
  • 9蔡怀崇,闵行.材料力学[M].西安交通大学版社,2004:109-113.
  • 10James H. Starnes Jr. , Damodar R. Ambur,Richard D. Young,et al. Experimental Verification of the Analytical Methodology to Predict the Residual Strength of Metallic Shell Structure [ R ]. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23681-2199, 2004 : 1-4.

共引文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部