期刊文献+

罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼脉冲式给药用于分娩镇痛的临床效果观察 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 观察罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼脉冲式自控硬膜外分娩镇痛的临床效果。方法 选择自愿要求分娩镇痛的孕产妇360例为镇痛组,选择同期孕产妇360例为对照组。镇痛组于孕产妇有规律性宫缩宫口开大2~3 cm时硬膜外脉冲式注入药液,间隔30 min注入3~6 m L至分娩结束,观察2 h拔出硬膜外导管安全返回病房;对照组无任何镇痛措施。观察2组产妇分娩疼痛程度、产程时间及产后出血量、缩宫素使用率、剖宫产率、新生儿窒息、产妇不良反应发生及阴道器械助产等情况。结果 镇痛组分娩时疼痛程度明显减轻,与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05);镇痛组第一产程活跃期时间明显缩短,与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05);2组第二产程、第三产程和产后出血量比较差异无统计学意义(P> 0. 05);镇痛组缩宫素使用率高,剖宫产率降低,与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05);2组新生儿窒息率、不良反应发生率、阴道器械助产比较差异无统计学意义(P> 0. 05)。结论 罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼用于分娩镇痛可降低产妇分娩时的疼痛程度,对母婴无不良影响,不影响新生儿预后,具有可行性。
出处 《宁夏医学杂志》 CAS 2022年第7期651-653,共3页 Ningxia Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献25

  • 1Mousa WF, A1-Metwalli R, Mostafa M. Epidural analgesia during labor vs no analgesia A comparative study[J]. Saudi J Anaesth, 2012, 6(1) 36-40.
  • 2Purdie NL, Mc Grady EM. Comparison of patient-controlled epidural bolus administration of O. % ropivacaine and O. 1% levobupivacaine, both with O. 0002 fentanyl,for analgesia during labour[J]. Anaes-thesia,2004,59(2):133 137.
  • 3Knudsen K, Beckman Suurkiila M, Blomberg S, et al. Cent ral nervous and cardiovascular effects of i.v. infusions of ropivacaine, bupivacaine and placebo in volunteers[J]. Br J Anaesth, 1997,78(5) : 507 514.
  • 4Higgins J,Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of in- terventions version 5. 0. 0 [ M]. The Cochrane Collaboration: Jolm Wiley Sons, 2008 42-47.
  • 5Reynolds F, Sharma FK, Seed PT. Analgesia in labor and fetal addbase balance: A metanalysis comparing epidural with systemic opioid analysia[J] BJOG,2003,109(12) :1344-1353.
  • 6Halpem SH, Walsh V. Epidural ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for la bor A mata-analysis[J]. Anesth Analg, 2003,96(5) : 1473-1479.
  • 7Yamashita A, Matsumoto M, Matsumoto S, et al. A comparison of the neurotoxic effects on the spinal cord of tetracaine,lidocaine, bupiv aine, and ropivacaine administered intrathecaUy in rabbits[J]. Anesth Analg,2003,97(2) : 512-519.
  • 8Lim Y, Sia AT, Ocampo C. Automated regular boluses for epidural analgesia: a comparison with continuous infusion. Int J Obstet Anesth, 2005, 14(4): 305-309.
  • 9Wong CA, Ratliff JT, Sullivan JT, et al. A randomized corn parison of programmed intermittent epidural bolus with contin uous epidural infusion for labor analgesia. Anesth Analg, 2006, 102(3): 904-909.
  • 10Feng SW, Xu SQ, Ma L, et al. Regular intermittent bolus provides similar incidence of maternal fever compared with con- tinuous infusion during epidural labor analgesia. Saudi Med J, 2014, 35(10): 1237-1242.

共引文献95

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部