期刊文献+

企业言行不一的顺序效应与消费者伪善感知分析

An Analysis of the Sequential Effect and Consumers’ Perception of Corporate Hypocrisy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 企业伪善是指企业在承担社会责任的过程中出现的所宣传的CSR理念与实际行动不一的现象,通过bootstrap中介效应分析,研究企业捐赠中由于言行不一的顺序效应而导致消费者伪善感知的差异,得出以下结论:第一,企业伪善言行顺序对消费者伪善感知存在显著影响,相对于先做后说情景,先说后做情景下消费者伪善感知程度更高;第二,企业声誉的调节效应:声誉良好的公司,公众对其伪善行为的情境归因更高;而声誉一般的公司,公众对其伪善行为的特质归因更高;第三,消费者归因在企业伪善言行顺序对消费者伪善感知的影响过程中起到部分中介,特质归因对消费者伪善的间接效应随着企业声誉的提高而提高,而情景归因对消费者伪善的间接效应则随着企业声誉的提高而降低。这些结论有助于深入了解消费者对企业伪善行为的感知,为企业正确承担社会责任提供借鉴和指导意义。 Corporate hypocrisy refers to the discrepancy between propagated CSR concept and actual deeds in undertaking social responsibility.Through mediation analysis with bootstrapping, this paper analyzes the difference in consumers’ perception of corporate hypocrisy caused by the sequential effect of inconsistent words and actions in corporate donation.The findings are as follows:(1) the sequence of words and deeds of enterprises’ hypocrisy has a significant impact on consumers’ perception of hypocrisy.Compared with the situation of “doing first and then speaking”,that of “speaking first and then doing” may trigger a higher consumers’ perception of hypocrisy;(2) the moderating effect of corporate reputation: the public made more situational attributions for companies with a good reputation and more dispositional attributions for companies with an average reputation;(3) consumers’ attribution partially mediates consumers’ perception of corporate hypocrisy caused by the sequence of corporate hypocritical words and actions;the indirect effect of dispositional attribution on consumers’ perception of hypocrisy is strengthened with the corporate reputation promoted, while that of situational attribution on consumers’ perception of hypocrisy is weakened in the same situation.These findings can deepen the understanding of consumers’ perception of corporate hypocrisy and provide reference and guidance for companies to shoulder social responsibilities in a desirable way.
作者 江帆 JIANG Fan(Shunde Polytechnic,Shunde,Guangdong,528333,China)
出处 《武汉商学院学报》 2022年第3期80-86,共7页 Journal of Wuhan Business University
关键词 社会责任 归因 伪善感知 声誉 social responsibility attribution perception of hypocrisy reputation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献49

  • 1周延风,罗文恩,肖文建.企业社会责任行为与消费者响应——消费者个人特征和价格信号的调节[J].中国工业经济,2007(3):62-69. 被引量:161
  • 2温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,刘红云.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620. 被引量:7413
  • 3倪梁康.论伪善:一个语言哲学的和现象学的分析[J].哲学研究,2006(7):91-95. 被引量:26
  • 4Argyris C and Schon D. Theory in practiee[M]. San Francis- co: Jossey-Bass, 1978.
  • 5Bandura A. Origins of terrorism: Psychologies, ideologies, theo- logies, states of mind [M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
  • 6Barden J, et al. "Saying one thing and doing another": Exami-ning the impact of event order on hypocrisy judgments of others[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2005, 31(11):1463-1474.
  • 7Batson C D, et al. Moral hypocrisy: Addressing some alterna- tives[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001, 83(2) :330-339.
  • 8Batson C D, et al. Doing business after the fall:The virtue of moral hypocrisy [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2006,66 (4): 321-335.
  • 9Batson C D. Moral masquerades: Experimental exploration of the nature of moral motivation[J]. Phenomenology and Cogni tive Sciences,2008,7(1) :51- 66.
  • 10Biehal G J and Sheinin D A. The influence of corporate messa- ges on the product portfolio[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2007, 71(2):12- 25.

共引文献520

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部