中国交通肇事罪案件的司法过程考论--以S省M市部分案例为核心的考察

Judicial Process of Traffic Accident Crime Cases in China An Investigation with Cases in M City,S Province as the Core

对于交通肇事(罪),国家在责难肇事行为人的基础上努力平衡国家、市场、当事人间的利益。作为实现正义的刑事诉讼程序(及其法官之司法过程)对此有充分体现,与《刑法》责难行为人形成鲜明对照。通过实证研究方法详细描绘交通肇事罪案件的刑事诉讼程序与法官之司法过程,可以得出如下判断:(1)既有的法律制度已将国家、市场、当事人各方的权力、权利、义务作较好配置,大部分交通肇事案件成为简单案件,进而法官可以独立办案。(2)在没有保险保障的语境下,仍属“复杂”案件,但案件量非常少。法官也能独立审判,但审判委员会等主体仍有影响的可能。

For traffic accidents(crimes),China strives to balance the interests of the state,the market and the parties on the basis of blaming the perpetrators.This is reflected in the criminal procedure(and the judicial process of the judge)as the realization of justice,which is in sharp contrast to the censure of the perpetrator in the Criminal Law.Through empirical research methods to describe in detail the criminal procedure of traffic accident crimes and the judicial process of judges,the following judgments can be drawn:(1)The existing legal system has made the power,rights and obligations of the state,the market,and the parties involved as with better configuration,most traffic accident cases become simple cases,and judges can handle the cases independently.(2)In the context of no insurance protection,it is still a“complex”case,but the number of cases is very small.Judges can also adjudicate independently,but subjects such as adjudication committees may still have influence.