论行政协议撤销案件的审理逻辑——以展鹏铸造厂诉安吉县政府搬迁案为视角

On the Trial Logic of Administrative Agreement Revocation Cases——From the Perspective of Anji Zhanpeng Metal Precision Foundry v. Anji County People’s Government Relocation Administrative Agreement

在缺少实体立法明确指引情况下,人民法院处理行政协议撤销案件时,无论是法律适用还是审理方式,都存在较大认识分歧,有必要通过理论检讨谋求共识。“安吉展鹏金属精密铸造厂诉安吉县人民政府搬迁行政协议案”提供了一个很好的范本。通过检讨审理该案的一、二审法院裁判意见,可以确立以下观点:行政协议撤销诉讼属于公法上当事人诉讼,不适用传统的单方行政处理撤销诉讼的受理规则;案件审理适用双向审查模式,审理焦点为行政协议应否撤销;行政机关一方的缔约行为是否合法只作为判断协议是否生效的一个要件,不应作为审理焦点,更不应单独成为司法裁判对象。

Due to the absence of substantive legislation guidance, there are great differences in understanding both the application of law and the way of trial in the case of administrative agreement revocation.It is necessary to seek consensus through theoretical review.“Anji Zhanpeng Metal Precision Foundry v.Anji County People’s Government relocation administrative agreement”provides a good model.By reviewing the judgment opinions of the courts of first and second instance, we can establish the following views: the administrative agreement revocation action belongs to the party action in public law, and the traditional acceptance rules of unilateral administrative act revocation action are not applicable;The case trial applies the two-way review mode, and the trial focus is whether the administrative agreement should be revoked;The legality of the contracting act of the administrative organ is only an important element to judge whether the agreement is effective, which should not be the focus of the trial, and not be the object of judicial judgment alone.