乡村地利博弈中情感治理的实践基础与运作机制

Practical Basis and Operation Mechanism of the Emotional Governance in the Game of Rural Land-interest

情感治理根植于中国乡土社会的文化价值体系,是在基层治理现代化转型过程中处理大量“群众工作”所不可或缺的治理工具。以地利显化为核心的博弈行为成为撬动广大“半城半乡”地带基层治理转型的重要动力。以地利博弈为载体,基于东中西部多个过渡型社区的田野考察,将情感治理置于具体的“弱分利—弱治理”“弱分利—强治理”“强分利—弱治理”三重村社分化治理场景之中。在基层社会治理活动中,情感治理通过“正式”治理、“非正式”治理和“类正式”治理三种模式类型实现治理需求。探析刚性治理规则与柔性地权意识之下的两点触发机理,情感治理得以有效地适配基层社会复杂多元的地利博弈环境。情感治理弥合了精细化、规范化治理的不足,情感要素的协同参与是对基层治理规则和制度难以无缝供给的补充,彰显了“以人为本”的善治目标。

Emotional governance is rooted in the cultural value system of Chinese rural society. It is an indispensable governance tool to make up for a large number of mass-work in the implementation of technical rationality under the modernization of national governance. The game behavior centered on the manifestation of geographical advantages has become an important driving force for the transformation of grassroots governance in the vast half-urban and half-rural zone. The research uses the game of geographical advantage as the carrier, and based on fieldwork of multiple transitional communities in the east, middle and west. The emotional governance is placed in the specific weak distribution-weak governance, weak distribution-strong governance, and strong distribution-weak governance village community differentiation governance scenarios. In grass-roots social governance activities, emotional governance achieves governance needs through three types of modes: formal governance, informal governance and quasi-formal governance. The research further explores that under the rigid governance rules and the flexible land rights awareness, due to the two mechanisms of normal accumulation triggering and movement key triggering, emotional governance can effectively adapt to the complex and diverse geography game environment of the grassroots society. Emotional governance bridges the shortcomings of refined and standardized governance. The collaborative participation of emotional elements is a supplement to the difficult supply of grass-roots governance rules and systems, and it also highlights the people-oriented goal of good governance.