期刊文献+

视觉修辞现代发生的知识学谱系及其话语生产 被引量:3

Knowledge Genealogy of Modern Occurrence of Visual Rhetoric and Its Discourse Production
下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为修辞学在视觉场域的定向实践,视觉修辞的现代发生一方面缘于对传统修辞学“劝服”意旨的接纳与承继,它赋予视觉修辞作为修辞学的族群身份与审美基因;另一方面又得益于新修辞学对修辞实践对象谱系的拓展,它赋予视觉符号作为一种非语言的他者符号介入修辞场域的理论合法性。罗兰·巴特对“图像修辞学”的学术验证与文本实践将视觉符号的修辞实践导向现实,贡布里希则从艺术史的视角为这一修辞实践提供了理论支撑与经验范式,而“图像转向”的文化语境在加持视觉修辞现代实践的同时,也为媒介修辞、实物修辞以及空间修辞的属种衍化提供了可行性方案。由此架设的知识学谱系不仅成为视觉修辞现代发生的理论框架,而且也是这一修辞范式的实践根基。 As a directed practice of rhetoric in the visual field, the modern occurrence of visual rhetoric, on the one hand, is derived from the acceptance and inheritance of the persuasion intention of traditional rhetoric, which endows visual rhetoric with the ethnic identity and aesthetic gene of rhetoric;on the other hand, it benefits from the development of new rhetoric in terms of the genealogy of rhetoric practical objects. It gives the theoretical legitimacy of visual symbols as non-verbal signs of the other to intervene in the rhetorical field. Roland Barth’s academic verification and textual practice of image rhetoric has led the rhetorical practice of visual symbols to reality, and Gombrich has provided theoretical support and empirical paradigm for the rhetorical practice from the perspective of art history. The cultural context of image turning, however, not only facilitates the modern practice of visual rhetoric, but also provides a feasible plan for the generic derivation of media rhetoric, physical rhetoric and space rhetoric. The constructed knowledge genealogy, therefore, is deemed as the theoretical framework of modern occurrence of visual rhetoric, and also as the practical foundation of the rhetorical paradigm.
作者 张伟 ZHANG Wei(Institute of Hermeneutics,Guangdong University of Foreign Studies,Guangzhou Guangdong 510420,China)
出处 《内蒙古社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第4期138-145,F0003,共9页 Inner Mongolia Social Sciences
基金 中宣部宣传思想文化青年英才自主选题资助项目“当代视觉修辞的辞格谱系研究”。
关键词 视觉修辞 新修辞学 图像叙事 劝服观 视觉表征 Visual Rhetoric New Rhetoric Image Narration View of Persuasion Visual Representation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献10

  • 1刘禾,曹雷雨.知识分子和批评思考的视域——W.J.T·米切尔教授访谈录[J].文艺研究,2005(10):87-99. 被引量:19
  • 2尼尔·柯蒂斯(Nealcuds)主编.《图像转向》(The Pictorial Tum,Oxon:Roudedge,2010).
  • 3刘晋晋.《图像的晕头转向-对W.J.T.米切尔的理解与误解》,邹跃进、顾丞峰主编.《批评家》第四辑,四川美术出版社2009年版.
  • 4W.J.T. Mitchell, What Do Pictures Want?: The Lives and Loves of Images, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2005, p. 2, p. 85, p. 6.
  • 5W. J. T. Mitchell, Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation,Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1994, p. 16, p. 15, p. 11, p. 13, p. 17, p. 34, p. 26, p. 33, p. 16, p. 38, p. 38, p. 40, p. 41, p. 49.
  • 6Neal Curtis (ed.), The Pictorial Turn, p. 22, p. 20.
  • 7维特根斯坦.《逻辑哲学论》,王平复译,九州出版社2007年版,第77页.
  • 8欧文·潘诺夫斯基.《图像学研究-文艺复兴时期艺术的人文主题》,戚印平、范景中译,上海三联书店2011年版,第2页.
  • 9尼古拉斯·米尔佐夫.《视觉文化导论》,倪伟译,江苏人民出版社,2006年版,第161-226页.
  • 10尹德辉.新世纪以来国内“图像”研究述评[J].文艺争鸣,2010(5X):4-13. 被引量:12

共引文献157

同被引文献38

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部