期刊文献+

Atomism,Communitarianism,and Confucian Familism

原文传递
导出
摘要 Charles Taylor criticizes many liberal theories based on a kind of atomism that assumes the individual self-sufficiency outside the polity.This not only causes soft-relativism and political fragmentation but also undermines the solidarity of the community,that is,the very condition of the formation of autonomous citizens.Taylor thus argues for communitarian politics which protects certain cultural common goods for sustaining the solidarity of the community.However,Brenda Lyshaug criticizes Taylor’s communitarianism as suppressing plurality and enhancing hostility among cultural groups.In the face of such controversies,I argue for modern Confucian familism which emphasizes the family as a common good that provides a safe,stable,and nurturing environment for nurturing children and cultivating civility for future generations with a sense of community and autonomy.I also defend Confucian familism from four possible criticisms:insufficiency of familism,hierarchical relationship in the family,the danger of nepotism,and challenge from postmodern families.I argue that unlike traditional Confucianism,modern moderation of the Confucian family can greatly reduce the hierarchical problem;its emphasis on the family as one of the foundations of politics can avoid the danger of being atomistic liberalism and suppressive communitarianism.
出处 《Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences》 2022年第2期259-275,共17页 复旦人文社会科学论丛(英文版)
基金 My work on this article is partially supported by a Grant from the College of Professional and Continuing Education,an affiliate of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献22

  • 1Chan, Wing-tsit. 1963. A source book in Chinese philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • 2Fingarette, Herbert. 1972. Confucius: The secular as sacred. New York: Harper & Row.
  • 3Fung, Yu-lan. 1952. A history of Chinese philosophy, vol. 1. (trans: Derk Bodde). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • 4Hall, David, and Roger Ames. 1995. Anticipating China. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • 5Hall, David, and Roger Ames. 1999. The democracy of the dead. Chicago, Lasalle: Open Court.
  • 6Ivanhoe, Philip J., and Van Norden, Bryan. 2001. Readings in classical Chinese philosophy. New York: Seven Bridges. Knoblock, John, trans. 1988-1994. Xunzi: A translation and study of the complete works, 3 vols. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • 7Lau, Din Cheuk, trans. 1970. Mencius. Harmondsworth: Penguin. Lau, Din Cheuk, trans. 2000. Confucius: The analects.
  • 8Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press. Legge, James, trans. 1960. The Chinese Classics, vols. 1 & 3.
  • 9Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong Press.
  • 10Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Liu, Qing-ping. 2007.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部