期刊文献+

基于前景理论和熵权法的交叉效率集结方法 被引量:5

Cross-efficiency Aggregation Method Based on Prospect Theory and Entropy Weight Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统的交叉效率集结过程通常采用算术平均方法,不仅会低估自评的重要性,而且未考虑决策者的风险偏好。针对上述问题,提出一种基于前景理论和熵权法的交叉效率集结方法。首先,求解交叉效率矩阵,运用熵权法确定他评过程中评价单元的指标权重。然后,引入前景理论以考虑决策者在交叉效率集结过程中的风险偏好,利用TOPSIS方法识别正负参考点,进而构造总体效用函数,得到前景交叉效率矩阵。随后,构建最大化前景价值模型,求解集结权重。该方法既考虑到交叉效率集结的相对重要性权重,又将决策者的风险偏好纳入到效率评价中,从而实现决策单元的全排序。最后,结合实例验证方法的有效性。 The traditional cross-efficiency aggregation process usually adopts the arithmetic mean method,which not only underestimates the importance of self-evaluation of decision-making units but also does not take into consideration the decision maker’s risk preferences.Given the above questions,this paper proposes a cross-efficiency aggregation method based on prospect theory and entropy weight method.Firstly,solve the cross efficiency matrix,and the entropy weight method is applied to solve the index weight of each evaluation unit in the peer evaluation process.Then,the prospect theory is introduced to reflect the risk preferences of decision-makers in the cross efficiency aggregation process,and the TOPSIS method is applied to identify positive and negative reference points,and then construct the overall utility function to obtain the prospect cross efficiency matrix.Subsequently,a model for maximizing the prospect value is constructed to solve the aggregation weight of cross efficiencies.This method not only considers the relative importance weights for cross-efficiency aggregation but also incorporates the risk preferences of decision-makers into the efficiency evaluation to realize the overall ranking of decision-making units.Finally,an example is given to illustrate the effectiveness of the method proposed.
作者 梅鑫南 王应明 MEI Xin-nan;WANG Ying-ming(School of Economics and Management,Fuzhou University,Fuzhou 350108,China)
出处 《运筹与管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2022年第7期35-41,共7页 Operations Research and Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(61773123)。
关键词 数据包络分析 交叉效率 前景理论 熵权法 data envelopment analysis cross-efficiency prospect theory entropy weight method
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献71

  • 1孙晓东,焦玥,胡劲松.基于灰色关联度和理想解法的决策方法研究[J].中国管理科学,2005,13(4):63-68. 被引量:158
  • 2陈芝,单汨源,顾恒平.基于DEA的企业供应物流系统效率评价的实例分析[J].湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2005,19(6):68-71. 被引量:28
  • 3杨克磊,高博,卢赫.企业物流绩效评价的DEA分析[J].哈尔滨商业大学学报(社会科学版),2006(3):67-69. 被引量:14
  • 4孙晓东,田澎,焦玥,胡劲松.类加权主成分分析在企业物流绩效评价中的应用[J].工业工程与管理,2007,12(1):57-63. 被引量:21
  • 5Zhu J. Quantitative Models for performance Evaluation and benchmarking.- Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets and DEA Excel Solver [M]. Boston.-Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003: 246 252.
  • 6Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units [J].European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2: 429-444.
  • 7Adler N, Friedman L, Sinuany S Z. Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context [J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 140: 249-265.
  • 8Sexton T R, Silkman R H, Hogan A J. Data envelopment analysis : Critique and extensions [J]. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986 (32): 73-105.
  • 9Shang J, Sueyoshi T. A unified framework for the selection of a flexible manufacturing system [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1995, 85 297-315.
  • 10Oral M, Kettani O, Lang P. A methodology for collective evaluation and selection of industrial R&D projects [J]. Management Science, 1991, 37: 871-885.

共引文献142

同被引文献41

引证文献5

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部