期刊文献+

从国家主义走向世界主义——自由主义国际秩序的辨析与反思 被引量:7

From Nationalism to Cosmopolitanism——Analysis and Refiection on the Liberal International Order
原文传递
导出
摘要 备受西方推崇的“自由主义国际秩序”由于近20年来世界大变局的新形势引发了诸多思考和讨论。虽然自由主义国际秩序发端于西方民主国家的互动,不过该秩序内含的扩张性和排异性推动着西方世界在冷战后力求将其扩展为全球秩序。在认知中,时常存在将自由主义国际秩序与以联合国为核心的国际秩序相混淆的情况,但事实上二者在思想理念、相应规划上均存在差异。与自由主义国际秩序基于现代性规划所形成的强势决定论不同,以联合国为核心的国际秩序拥有明显的世界主义倾向,对和平的诉求、人权的保障以及追求世界范围内的公平正义使得该秩序在变化的国际环境中拥有源源不绝的发展动力。一方面要承认自由主义国际秩序在传播自由民主、市场开放、制度化安排等方面对世界起到的积极作用;另一方面也必须指出,该秩序的干涉取向、等级思维以及自由主义内部缺陷不仅给国际社会带来破坏性影响,而且导致自身陷入危机。在全球化迅速发展、全球问题愈发严峻的今天,国家主义的思维模式注定无法获得广泛认同,以世界主义为指导,将人类视作相互依存的整体,进行平等的对话、协商与合作才是摆脱诸多困境的关键。 The “liberal international order”,which is highly respected by the West,has aroused much attention due to the new situation of the great changes in the world in the past two decades.Although the liberal international order originated from the interaction of Western democracies,the expansion and exclusion implicit in the order pushed the Western world to expand it into a global order after the Cold War.In cognition,there are often cases of confusing the liberal international order with the international order of the United Nations,but the fact is that there are differences in ideological concepts and corresponding planning.It is particularly noteworthy that unlike the strong determinism formed by the liberal international order based on the planning of modernity,the international order of the United Nations has a clear cosmopolitan tendency,and the demand for peace,the protection of human rights,and the pursuit of fairness and justice in the world make the order have an endless momentum of development in the changing international environment.Through vertical combing and horizontal comparison of the liberal international order,the status and role of the order can be evaluated more rationally and objectively.In general,in today’s rapid development of globalization and increasingly serious global problems,the rational thinking mode of the country is doomed to fail to gain recognition,guided by cosmopolitanism,regarding human beings as an interdependent whole,and equal dialogue,consultation and cooperation are the keys to overcome difficulties.
作者 蔡拓 张冰冰 Cai Tuo;Zhang Bingbing
出处 《探索与争鸣》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第7期31-46,177,共17页 Exploration and Free Views
关键词 自由主义国际秩序 联合国 国家主义 世界主义 liberal international order United Nations nationalism cosmopolitism
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献55

  • 1马德普.历史主义的兴起及其对自由主义普遍主义的冲击[J].政治学研究,2003(4):65-74. 被引量:15
  • 2周琦,张永义.从美国霸权看联合国集体安全的悖论[J].当代世界与社会主义,2006(4):83-86. 被引量:2
  • 3《荀子·王制》,北京燕山出版社,1995年.
  • 4《礼记·礼运》,47页,中华书局,1997年.
  • 5.《论语·雍也》[M].,..
  • 6.《尚书·尧典》[M].,..
  • 7根据"全球政策论坛"提供的数据整理.见Global Policy Forum,"Changing Patterns in the Use of the Veto inthe Security Council", http:∥www.globalpolicy.org/security/data/vetotab.htm, http:∥www.globalpolicy.org/security/membship/veto/vetosubj.htm.
  • 8.温家宝总理在2003年12月8日会见联合国秘书长安南的讲话[EB/OL].http:∥www.fmprc.gov.cn/chn/wjb/zzjg/gjs/gjzzyhy/-1115/t55834.htm.,.
  • 9Benita Ferrero-Waldner, EU External Commissioner, "The Future of the UN: Results of the Kofi Annan High Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change", Speech at the Conference organized by the EPC and the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, Brussels, Dec. 8, 2004.
  • 10EU, "A Secure Europe in A Better World, European Security Strategy", Brussels, 12, December, 2003.

共引文献181

同被引文献135

引证文献7

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部