期刊文献+

多周期库存系统订货决策偏差行为成因--基于双曲贴现视角 被引量:1

Behavioral Cause of Ordering Decision Bias in Multi-Period Inventory System--A Perspective of Hyperbolic-Discounting
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对考虑订货提前期与批量订货的多周期库存系统,利用双曲贴现模型刻画销售商的时间偏好,研究最小化心理账户理论刻画的负效用下的订货决策偏差。理论分析与数值仿真试验显示:双曲贴现倾向是导致低估供应线的一个显著的行为原因。随双曲贴现程度增强,低估供应线程度加剧,进而导致平均每周期运营成本增加。敏感性分析表明:低估供应线程度随订货提前期和订货批量的增加而削弱,随单位持有成本和需求波动性增加而加剧。 In a multi-period inventory system with lead time and batch ordering,this paper depicts a seller's time preference by the hyperbolic-discounting model,and studies ordering decision bias when minimizing the disutility described based on the mental accounting theory.Theoretical analysis and numerical simulations show that the hyperbolic-discounting disposition is a significant behavioral cause of the underweighting supply line.As the degree of the hyperbolic-discounting grows,the extent of the underweighting supply line and the average operational cost per period are raised.Sensitive analyses display that the extent of the underweighting supply line is weakened with an increase in lead time and the batch ordering size,but it is raised with an increase in the holding cost and demand variability.
作者 牟博佼 李岩 MU Bo-jiao;LI Yan(School of Economics and Management,China University of Geoscie(Beijing),Beijing 100083;School of Manageme,China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing,Beijing 100083)
出处 《软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第7期111-117,共7页 Soft Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71502170)。
关键词 双曲贴现 低估供应线 多周期库存 牛鞭效应 hyperbolic-discounting underweighting supply line multi-period inventory bullwhip effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献31

  • 1李旭,陈雨生.基于系统结构调整的牛鞭效应控制问题研究[J].物流技术,2006,25(10):58-60. 被引量:1
  • 2宋留栓,朱福良,张颖敏.供应链中牛鞭效应的控制与弱化研究[J].工业工程,2006,9(6):35-39. 被引量:4
  • 3Forrester J W. Industrial Dynamics; A Breakthrough for Decision Makers[J]. Harvard Business Review,1958,36(4) :37-66.
  • 4Lee H L, Padmanabhan V, Whang S. The Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chains[J]. Sloan Management Review, 1997a, 38(3): 93-102.
  • 5Towill D. Time Compression and the Supply Chain - A Guided Tour[ J]. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 1996, 1(1): 15-27.
  • 6Forrester J W. Industrial Dynamics [ M ]. MIT Press/Wiley, Cambridge, MA/London, 1961.
  • 7Sterman J D. Modeling Managerial Behavior: Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment[ J]. Management Science, 1989, 35(3) : 321-339.
  • 8Lee H L, Padmanabhan V, Whang S. Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect [ J ]. Management Science, 1997b, 43(4) : 546-558.
  • 9Cachon F, Gerard, M. Managing Supply Chain Demand Variability with Scheduled Ordering Policies[ J ]. Management Science, 1999, 45(6) : 843-856.
  • 10Chen F, Drezner Z, Ryan J K, Simchi - Levi D. Quantifying the Bullwhip Effect in a Simple Supply Chain: The Impact of Forecasting, Lead times, and Information [ J ]. Management Science, 2000,46 ( 3 ):436-443.

共引文献11

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部