李大钊、郭沫若与中国马克思主义史学的形成

Li Dazhao, Guo Moruo and the Formation of Chinese Marxist Historiography

在以往的史学史叙事中,围绕李大钊与郭沫若的学术定位,曾经呈现出一定的张力,这是伴随着李大钊史学贡献的“再发现”而来的。对他们的评价,受到理论渊源、学术范式、学术传统、政治因素等方面的影响,同时也牵涉中国马克思主义史学的起点认知和分期问题。应当辩证认识中国马克思主义史学诞生的历程与节点。在诸种分期标准和分期方式中,史学形态为比较合适的分期标准,中国社会性质和社会史论战为比较合适的马克思主义史学形成标志,李大钊和郭沫若则分别为中国马克思主义史学萌芽期和形成期的标志性人物。

In the past historical narration, there was a certain tension around the academic positioning of Li Dazhao and Guo Moruo, which came with the “rediscovery” of Li Dazhao’s historical contribution. Their evaluation is influenced by theoretical origins, academic paradigms, academic traditions, political factors, etc. It also involves the starting point cognition and staging of Chinese Marxist historiography. The process and nodes of the birth of Chinese Marxist historiography should be dialectically understood. Among the various staging standards and staging methods, the historical form is the more appropriate staging standard, the Chinese social nature and social history debate are the more appropriate symbols of the formation of Marxist historiography, and Li Dazhao and Guo Moruo are the landmark figures in the embryonic and formative stages of Chinese Marxist historiography respectively.