期刊文献+

高校教师“非升即走”的困境与对策 被引量:3

Optimization Logic for Dissimilation of“Promotion or Leave”Policy in University
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着人才竞争的日趋激烈,“非升即走”已逐步成为部分高校聘任师资的优选机制。一方面,“非升即走”是鼓励教师科研产出的有效指挥棒,也促进了人才的合理流动。但另一方面,部分高校在推行“非升即走”制度的过程中,片面追求科研绩效,让这项制度失去了甄选人才的本意,导致了用人主体和教师群体的矛盾频发。因此,高校如何在吸收借鉴国外成功经验的基础上,结合实际,解决“非升即走”过程中出现的问题,值得研究。 With the increasingly fierce talent competition,“promotion or leave”has gradually become the preferred mechanism for some colleges and universities to recruit teachers.On the one hand,“promotion or leaving”is an effective baton to encourage teachers'scientific research output and promote the reasonable flow of talents.But on the other hand,some colleges and universities in the implementation of the“promotion or leave”system process resulting in frequent conflicts between the employer and the teacher group,because of divorcing from the reality of colleges and universities,and completely copy the western experience,and at the same time,lack of necessary supporting measures.Therefore,it is worth studying how to solve the problems in the process of“either upgrading or leaving”on the basis of absorbing foreign successful experience and combining reality.This paper combed the“not up or go”the origin and history of change,sums up the western education system under the“not up or go”characteristics,analyzed the domestic colleges and universities to introduce the possibility of the system,at the same time face to face with“not up or go”system in domestic colleges and universities are faced with the dilemma,and finally from the source of recruitment and evaluation system,and form a complete set of security three aspects put forward the optimization strategy.
作者 陈宗春 CHEN Zong-chun(Yangzhou University,Yangzhou 225000,China)
机构地区 扬州大学
出处 《民族高等教育研究》 2022年第4期71-75,共5页 Research on Higher Education of Nationalities
基金 2020年度江苏高校哲学社会科学研究一般项目“‘双一流’视域下高校博士后管理内涵建设的困境与突围”(项目编号:2020SJA1959)的阶段性成果。
关键词 “非升即走” 困境 对策 “Promotion or Leave”Policy Trouble Optimization
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献42

  • 1赵春玉.边疆民族地区法治人才培养的困境及应对[J].贵州民族研究,2021(1):181-187. 被引量:2
  • 2曾冬梅,席鸿建,黄国勋.专业人才培养方案的构建[J].清华大学教育研究,2002,23(5):98-101. 被引量:95
  • 3陈钊,子璇(校对).创新的价值、非对称信息与终身教职制度——兼论中国的高等教育改革[J].经济研究,2006,41(6):101-111. 被引量:29
  • 4郭建.哈佛大学发展史研究[M].石家庄:河北教育出版社,2000.247,144,47.
  • 5[美]R·K·默顿.科学社会学(上册)[M].鲁旭东,林聚任,译.北京:商务印书馆,2004.
  • 6Charles Kahn, Gur Huberman. Two-sided Uncertainty and "Up-or-Out" Contracts. Journal of Labor Economics, 1988,6, (4) :423-444.
  • 7]Diane Gillespie,Nives Dolsak,etc. Research Circles:Sup- porting the Scholarship of Junior Faculty. Innovative Higher Education, 2005,30, (3) : 149- 162.
  • 8Richard P. Chait,Andrew T. Ford. Beyond Traditional Tenure: Extended Probationary Periods and Suspension of "Up-or-out" Rule. Change, 1982,14, (5) :44-54.
  • 9Aloysius Siow. Tenure and Other Unusual Personnel Practices in Academia. JLEO, 1998,14, ( 1 ) : 152-173.
  • 10No Writer Attributed. Yale Adopts 'Up or Out' Tenure Policy For Faculty; Similar to Harvard's Plan:President Seymour Inaugurates System to Give Security, Flexibility. The Harvard Crimson,Nov. 15,1939. Retrieved Apr.27, 2012,from http://www.thecrimson.com/article/1939/11/15/ yale-adopts-up-or-out-tenure/.

共引文献40

同被引文献39

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部