期刊文献+

急性心肌梗死患者急诊行冠状动脉旁路移植术后院内死亡的危险因素分析 被引量:2

Risk factors analysis for hospital mortality after emergency coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with acute myocardial infarction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析急性心肌梗死(acute myocardial infarction,AMI)患者急诊行冠状动脉旁路移植术(coronary artery bypass grafting,CABG)后院内死亡的危险因素。方法回顾性分析2009—2019年青岛市市立医院急诊行CABG手术治疗145例AMI患者的临床资料,其中男108例(74.5%)、女37例(25.5%),平均年龄(67.7±11.5)岁。根据术后是否发生院内死亡将患者分为存活组(132例)和死亡组(13例),对术前及手术相关资料进行单因素和多因素logistic回归分析。结果术后院内死亡13例,院内死亡率为9.0%。单因素分析显示,院内死亡的影响因素为年龄≥70岁、近期心肌梗死、左室射血分数<30%、合并左主干狭窄/夹层、手术时间、同期行其它手术(P<0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析发现左室射血分数<30%[OR=2.235,95%CI(1.024,9.411),P=0.014]、近期心肌梗死[OR=4.027,95%CI(1.934,14.268),P=0.032]、手术时间[OR=1.039,95%CI(1.014,1.064),P=0.002]是紧急行CABG术后院内死亡的独立危险因素。结论AMI患者紧急行CABG获益良好,但左室射血分数<30%、近期发生心肌梗死患者院内死亡率高,应尽量缩短手术时间。 Objective To identify the risk factors for hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI)after emergency coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG).Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 145 AMI patients undergoing emergency CABG surgery in Qingdao Municipal Hospital from 2009 to 2019.There were 108(74.5%)males and 37(25.5%)females with a mean age of 67.7±11.5 years.According to whether there was in-hospital death after surgery,the patients were divided into a survival group(132 patients)and a death group(13 patients).Preoperative and operative data were analyzed by univariate analysis,followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis,to identify the risk factors for hospital mortality.Results Over all,13 patients died in the hospital after operation,with a mortality rate of 9.0%.In univariate analysis,significant risk factors for hospital mortality were age≥70 years,recent myocardial infarction,left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF)<30%,left main stenosis/dissection,operation time and simultaneous surgeries(P<0.05).Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that LVEF<30%(OR=2.235,95%CI 1.024-9.411,P=0.014),recent myocardial infarction(OR=4.027,95%CI 1.934-14.268,P=0.032),operation time(OR=1.039,95%CI 1.014-1.064,P=0.002)were independent risk factors for hospital mortality after emergency CABG.Conclusion Emergency CABG in patients with AMI has good benefits,but patients with LVEF<30%and recent myocardial infarction have high in-hospital mortality,so the operation time should be shortened as much as possible.
作者 邓泓博 朱文杰 李磊 邓浩 生伟 陈奕涵 池一凡 华正东 DENG Hongbo;ZHU Wenjie;LI Lei;DENG Hao;SHENG Wei;CHEN Yihan;CHI Yifan;HUA Zhengdong(Department of Cardiovascular Surgery,Qingdao Municipal Hospital,Medical College of Qingdao University,Qingdao,266071,Shandong,P.R.China;Heart Center,Wuhan Asia General Hospital,Wuhan,430000,P.R.China;Department of Anesthesia Surgery,Qingdao Municipal Hospital,Medical College of Qingdao University,Qingdao,266071,Shandong,P.R.China;Department of Cardiovascular Surgery,Hiser Medical Center,Medical College of Qingdao University,Qingdao,266071,Shandong,P.R.China)
出处 《中国胸心血管外科临床杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2022年第8期1008-1013,共6页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
基金 青岛市卫计委课题(2018-WJZD009) 山东省医药科技卫生发展项目(202003011034)。
关键词 急诊 急性心肌梗死 冠状动脉旁路移植术 院内死亡 危险因素 Emergency acute myocardial infarction coronary artery bypass grafting hospital mortality risk factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献21

  • 1O'Connor GT,Pume SK,Olmsteed EM,et al.Multiveariate prediction of in-hospital mortdity associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery.Circulation,1992,85:2110-2118.
  • 2Moshkovitz Y,Sternik L,Paz Y,et al.Primary coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass in impaired left ventricular function.Ann Thorac Surg,1997,63:S44-47.
  • 3Kirklin JW,Barrat-Boyes BG,eds.Cardiac Surgery,2nd ed.New York:Churchill-Livingstone,1993:83-97.
  • 4Akins CW,Boucher CA,Pohost GM.Preservation of interventricular septal function in patients having coronary artery bypass.Am Heart J,1984,107:304-309.
  • 5Borger MA,Peniston CM,Weisel RD,et al.Neuropsychological impairment after coronary bypass surgery:effect of gaseous emboli during perfusionist interventions.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2001,121:743-749.
  • 6Diegeler A,Hirsch R,Schneider F,et al.Neuromonitoring and neurocognitive outcome in off-pump versus conventional coronary bypass operation.Ann Thorac Surg,2001,69:1162-1166.
  • 7Aseione R,Lloyd CT,Underwood MJ,et al.On-pump versus off-pump coronary revascularization:evaluation of renal function.Ann Thorac Surg,1999,68:493-498.
  • 8Puskas JD,Thourani VH,Marshall JJ,et al.Clinical outcomes,angiographic patency,and resource utilization in 200 consectutive off-pump coronary bypass patients.Ann Thorac surg,2001,71:477-484.
  • 9Grundeman PF,Borst C,Van Herwarden JA,et al.Vertical displacement of the beating heart by the octopus tissue stabilizer:influence on coronary flow.Ann Thorac Surg,1998,65:1348-1352.
  • 10Biswas S,Clements F,Diodato L,et al.Changes in sysyolic and diastolic function during multivessel off-pump coronary bypass grafting.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2001,20:913-917.

共引文献65

同被引文献34

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部