期刊文献+

共享审计师特征对审计质量的影响

下载PDF
导出
摘要 并购交易的不对称性使得共享审计师的作用越发重要,共享审计师对审计质量的影响也受到关注。文章选择2012—2020年A股市场中发生并购交易的上市公司为样本,验证共享审计师对审计质量的影响。研究发现:共享审计师通过发挥信息共享作用,能够提高并购方的审计质量;进一步研究发现,具备良好声誉的共享审计师出于利益循环的考虑,会在维持声誉的同时提高审计质量,推动共享审计师的正向调节作用;此外,行业专长这一优势也会为共享审计师提高审计质量起到促进作用。
作者 张楚
出处 《生产力研究》 2022年第8期151-155,共5页 Productivity Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献98

  • 1Ahmed, A. S., Takeda, C., & Thomas, S. (1999). Bank loan loss provisions: A reexamination of capital management, earnings management, and signaling effects. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28(1), 1-25.
  • 2Altamuro, J., & Beatty, A. (2010). How does internal control regulation affect financial reporting? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49(1-2), 58-74.
  • 3Arnedo, L., Lizarraga, F., & Sanchez, S. (2008). Discretionary accruals and auditor behaviour in code-law contexts: An application to failing Spanish finns. European Accounting Review, 17(4), 641-666.
  • 4Ashbaugh, H., LaFond, R., & Mayhew, B. W. (2003). Do nonaudit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. The Accounting Review, 78(3), 611-639.
  • 5Autore, D. M., Billingsley, R. S., & Schneller, M. I. (2009). Information uncertainty and auditor reputation. Journal of Banking and Finance, 33(2), 183-192.
  • 6Bartov, E., Gul, F. A., & Tsui, J. S. L. (2000). Discretionary-accruals models and audit qualltlcaUons. Journal oJ ACCOUnting ana Economics, 30(3), 421-452.
  • 7Basu, S., Hwang, L. S., & Jan, C. L. (2000). Differences in conservatism between big eight and non-big eight auditors. Working Paper, City University of New York and California State University.
  • 8Beatty, A. L., Ke, B., & Petroni, K. R. (2002). Earnings management to avoid earnings declines across publicly and privately held banks. The Accounting Review, 77(3), 547-570.
  • 9Becker, C. L., DeFond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J., & Subramanyam, K. R. (1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), 1-24.
  • 10Brown, J. R., Falaschetti, D., & Orlando, M. J. (2010). Auditor independence and earnings quality: Evidence for market discipline vs. Sarbanes-Oxley proscriptions. American Law and Economics Review, 12(1), 39-68.

共引文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部