期刊文献+

《人民日报》新冠肺炎疫情报道的批评话语分析

A Critical Discourse Analysis of Reports on COVID-19 Epidemic in People’s Daily
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章将《人民日报》作为语料来源,自建疫情报道语料库,对疫情报道进行了基于语料库的批评话语分析。研究发现,疫情报道的焦点信息集中在疫情本身、疫情应对、疫情影响、疫情相关地点人物以及时间等方面;焦点信息的呈现借助了四种话语策略,分别是自述与他述相结合、列举实例、利用修辞手法,以及对正能量的弘扬;焦点信息的呈现方式意在彰显伟大抗疫精神。《人民日报》对疫情进行的相关报道充满了积极健康向上的内容,这有利于人民安全,社会稳定,以及国家和谐。 This paper extracts news reports on COVID-19 epidemic from People’s Daily and builds a News Corpus.Based on this corpus,a Critical Discourse Analysis is made on the focal information of the news reports on COVID-19 epidemic.The result shows that:there are mainly 6 kinds of focal information of the news reports,including the information about the epidemic itself,about the epidemic response,about the epidemic influence,about the related place,about the related people,and about the related time;the focal information of the news reports is represented by means of 4 discourse strategies,including the combination of self statements and others statements,enumerating examples,employing rhetoric,and promoting positive energy;the focal information aims to emphasize China’s great spirit of combating the COVID-19 epidemic.The news reports on COVID-19 epidemic from People’s Daily convey positive meanings to people,which is beneficial to the safety of people,the stability of the society,and the harmony of the country.
作者 杜若凡 DU Ruo-fan(School of English Studies,Shanghai International Studies University,Shanghai 201620,China;School of Languages and media,Anhui University of Finance and Economics,Bengbu 233000,China)
出处 《宜春学院学报》 2022年第7期72-78,共7页 Journal of Yichun University
基金 2021年度安徽省高校科学研究项目(重点)“经管学科学术话语及科学思想演变研究”(项目编号:SK2021A0256) 安徽财经大学科学研究基金资助项目“基于语料库的古词英译本的译者风格研究”(项目编号:ACKYC20068)。
关键词 《人民日报》新冠肺炎疫情报道 焦点信息 语料库 批评话语分析 news reports on COVID-19 epidemic from People’s Daily focal information Corpus critical discourse analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献49

  • 1赵秀凤.能源话语的社会实践网络分析[J].话语研究论丛,2019(1):18-31. 被引量:10
  • 2钱毓芳.英国《太阳报》关于恐怖主义话语的主题词分析[J].浙江传媒学院学报,2010,17(4):98-103. 被引量:26
  • 3Baker, P. 2004. Querying keywords [J]. Journal of English Linguistics 32: 346-359.
  • 4Baker, P. &A. McEnery. 2005. A corpus-based approach to discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in UN and newspaper text [J]. Language and Politics 4.. 197-226.
  • 5Baker, P., C. Gabrielatos, M. Khosravinik, M. Krzyzanowski, A. McEnery&R. Wodak. 2008. A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press [J]. Discourse and Society 19: 273-306.
  • 6Berber-Sardinha, A. 2000. Comparing corpora with WordSmith Tools: How large must the reference corpus be? [A]. In The Proceedings of the Work-shop on Comparing Corpora [C]. Morristown, NJ. : Association for Computational Linguistics. 7-13.
  • 7Crouteau, D. & W. Hoynes. 2001. The Business of Media [M]. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Pine Forge Press.
  • 8Fairclough, N. 2000. New Labour, New Language? [M]. London: Routledge.
  • 9Firth, J. 1957. A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930-1955 [A]. In F. Palmer (ed.). Selected Papers of J. R. Firth 1952-59 [C]. London and Harlow: Longmans, Green and Co., Ltd. 168-205.
  • 10Flowerdew, J. 1997. The discourse of colonial with-drawal: A case study in the creation of mythic discourse[J]. Discourse and Society 8: 453-477.

共引文献642

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部