摘要
《注维摩诘经》中鸠摩罗什所作的“罗睺罗”注并不恰当,与《维摩诘经》的性质、主旨以及罗什的思想倾向不符.罗什引述此段文字,实则与他因心生“欲想”而破戒有关.罗什虽两次破戒,且曾心生欲想,其内心未必会因此而耿耿不安,在中土弘传大乘佛教才是他一生志向所在.
The annotation of“Rahula”made by Kumarajiva in the Annotated Vimalakirti-nirdesa Sutra is not appropriate,and is inconsistent with the nature and themes of the Vimalakirti-nirdesa Sutra and ideological tendency of Kumarajiva.The reason why Roche quotes this passage is actually related to his desire to break his precepts because of“desire”in his heart.Although Kumarajiva broke his precepts twice and had desires in his heart,his heart may not necessarily be disturbed because of this,as spreading Mahayana Buddhism in China is his lifelong ambition.
作者
张鑫媛
ZHANG Xin-yuan(Publicity Department,North Sichuan Medical College,Nanchong637000,Sichuan)
出处
《宝鸡文理学院学报(社会科学版)》
2022年第4期45-50,共6页
Journal of Baoji University of Arts and Sciences:Social Science Edition
基金
国家社会科学基金重点项目:汉译佛典文学研究(项目编号:12AZW007).
关键词
鸠摩罗什
破戒
维摩诘经
罗睺罗
Kumarajiva
breaking of religious percept
Vimalakirti-nirdesa Sutra
Rahula