摘要
煤层顶板水害一直影响煤矿安全开采。传统的“三图-双预测法”专业性强,评价过程复杂,适用范围有限,针对目前缺少一套适用于各种地质条件的顶板评价体系,运用“多类型四双法”(MTFD法)对煤层顶板涌(突)水危险性进行了预测评价,方法简单易懂,便于操作。将评价结果与传统的“三图—双预测法”对比,结果表明,“多类型四双法”的评价结果与实际验证结果吻合度更高。对于水文地质勘探程度较低,数据信息不全的矿井,“多类型四双法”更具优势。
The coal roof water hazard has always threatened coalmine safe extraction.The traditional“three zoning maps and dual water inflow predictions method”has issues of strong expertise needed,complex assessment process and limited application scope.Considering still short of an applicable roof assessment system set for various geological conditions up to now,the author has used the MTFD method carried out coal roof water inrush(bursting)hazard prediction and assessment.The method is easy to be understood and operated.Comparison of results from MTFD method and traditional“three zoning maps and dual water inflow predictions method”has shown that the assessed results from MTFD method have higher coincidence with actual validated results.Thus,to mines with lower hydrogeological exploration degree and imperfect data,information,the MTFD method has more advantageous.
作者
孙振洋
Sun Zhenyang(Hydrogeological Exploration Bureau,CNACG,Handan,Hebei 056004)
出处
《中国煤炭地质》
2022年第8期46-54,共9页
Coal Geology of China
关键词
“多类型四双法”
富水性指数
突水危险性指数
疏干水量预测
涌水量预测
“multi-type,four-double(MTFD)method”
water yield property index
water bursting hazard index
drainage water volume prediction
water inflow prediction