期刊文献+

S-Detect联合弹性成像辅助常规超声诊断乳腺肿瘤的价值 被引量:3

Combination of S-Detect and strain elastography in the conventional ultrasonic diagnosis of breast tumors
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨S-Detect技术联合弹性成像辅助常规超声鉴别诊断乳腺肿瘤良恶性的价值。方法回顾性分析2018年4月至2020年1月在汕头大学医学院第一附属医院超声检查的136例乳腺肿块患者的超声诊断资料,对超声科诊断为乳腺影像学报告和数据系统3类及以上的乳腺病灶,依次采用常规超声、应变式弹性成像应变率比值法(strain ratio,SR)、S-Detect检查技术进行横断面研究,并获得相应的良恶性判断结果,比较分析各单独诊断及联合诊断的效能。结果常规超声、SR、S-Detect单独及常规超声+SR、常规超声+S-Detect、常规超声+S-Detect+SR联合诊断乳腺肿瘤等六种方法的受试者工作曲线下面积(area under the receiver operating characteristic curve,AUC)分别为0.776、0.839、0.802、0.861、0.832和0.870。SR、S-Detect、常规超声+SR、常规超声+S-Detect常规超声+SR+S-Detect与常规超声组间比较,差异具有统计学意义(Z值分别为1.49、0.70、2.76、2.52、2.96,P值分别为0.137、0.484、0.006、0.012、0.003)。其中以常规超声+S-Detect+SR联合方法的准确度最高,为84.1%;与病理结果比较,其Kappa值为0.687,一致性最强。结论S-Detect联合应变式弹性成像技术辅助常规超声能显著提高乳腺肿瘤良恶性的诊断效能。 Objective To explore the value of s-detect combined with elastography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors.Methods The ultrasound diagnosis data of 136 patients with breast mass examined by ultrasound in the First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College from April 2018 to January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.The breast lesions diagnosed as BI-RADS 3 or above were analyzed by conventional ultrasound,strain elastic imaging strain ratio(SR)and S-Detect Computer-aided Diagnosis(CAD)technology successively and were used for cross-sectional study.The corresponding benign and malignant judgment results were obtained,and the efficacy of individual diagnosis and combined diagnosis were compared and analyzed.Results Conventional ultrasound,SR,S-Detect alone and conventional ultrasound+SR,conventional ultrasound+S-detect,conventional ultrasound+S-detect+SR combined diagnosis of breast tumors,the area under the receiver operating curve(AREA under the receiver operating curve Characteristic curve,AUC)were 0.776,0.839,0.802,0.861,0.832 and 0.870,respectively.SR,S-Detect,conventional ultrasound+SR,conventional ultrasound+S-detect and conventional ultrasound+SR+S-detect were compared with conventional ultrasound group,Z values were 1.49,0.70,2.76,2.52,2.96,respectively,and P values were 0.137,0.484,0.006,0.012 and 0.003,respectively.The difference was statistically significant.The accuracy of conventional ultrasound+S-Detect+SR was the highest(84.1%),compared with pathological results,its Kappa value was 0.687,showing the strongest consistency.Conclusion S-detect combined with strain elastography assisted by conventional ultrasound can significantly improve the diagnostic efficiency of benign and malignant breast tumors.
作者 詹伏兰 徐文君 王金宏 郑宝群 Zhan Fulan;Xu Wenjun;Wang Jinhong;Zheng Baoqun(Department of Ultrasound,First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College,Shantou 515041,China;Department of Ultrasound,Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University,Nanchang 330000,China)
出处 《中国综合临床》 2022年第4期320-326,共7页 Clinical Medicine of China
基金 广东省汕头市医疗卫生科技计划项目(2017119-13)。
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 应变式弹性成像 计算机辅助诊断技术 S-Detect技术 Breast tumor Strain elastography Computer-aided diagnosis S-Detect technique
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献21

共引文献404

同被引文献26

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部