期刊文献+

批评话语研究的新进展——《劳特利奇批评话语研究手册》评介 被引量:1

New advances in critical discourse studies: A review of The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies
原文传递
导出
摘要 适逢批评视角的话语研究诞生四十周年之际,劳特利奇出版社2018年出版John Flowerdew&John E. Richardson编著的《劳特利奇批评话语研究手册》。本文概述《手册》的内容,评价其学术贡献与特色。《手册》全面综述批评话语研究的主要理论、关键概念及其应用,反映批评话语研究主要理论路径、分析方法、关注问题和理论应用的最新发展状况和趋势。《手册》是批评话语研究领域的重要代表作,体现批评话语研究理论视野的拓新与融合、研究方法的丰富与更新,具有批判性、引领性、系统性和指导性,对国内的批评话语研究具有重要的参考价值。 Routledge published The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies compiled by John Flowerdew and John E. Richardson in 2018 on the occasion of the 40anniversary of the birth of the critical approach to discourse studies. This paper summarizes the content of the handbook and comments on its contributions and features. The handbook provides a comprehensive introduction to the main theories, key concepts and applications of critical discourse studies and describes the latest developments and tendencies of the main approaches, methods, issues and theoretical applications of critical discourse studies. As an important representative work in the field of critical discourse studies, the handbook manifests a newly expanded and integrated theoretical vision and the enriched and updated analytical methods, and demonstrates the characteristics of critical thinking, illuminating leading, systematic review and valuable guidance. The book is of great value and sheds light on the research into critical discourse studies at home.
作者 袁红梅 汪少华 YUAN Hongmei;WANG Shaohua
出处 《外语教学理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第2期78-84,共7页 Foreign Language Learning Theory And Practice
基金 2019年江苏高校哲学社会科学基金项目“美国主流媒体南海问题话语的批评认知研究”(编号:2019SJA0177) 2019年江苏省高校优秀中青年教师和校长境外研修资助项目 2018年度国家社科基金重点项目“习近平总书记语言风格研究”(编号:18AYY022)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词 批评话语研究 批评话语分析 研究路径 分析方法 critical discourse studies critical discourse analysis approaches analytical methods
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献64

  • 1武建国,谢洪.批判性话语分析的新成果——Fairclough《分析话语》评介[J].现代外语,2004,27(4):432-435. 被引量:13
  • 2田海龙.语篇研究的批评视角:从批评语言学到批评话语分析[J].山东外语教学,2006,27(2):40-47. 被引量:89
  • 3田海龙.实践结点研究的批评视角[J].外语与外语教学,2007(3):1-4. 被引量:5
  • 4Attar, A. & A. Genus. 2014. Framing public engagement: A critical discourse analysis of GM nation? [J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 88: 241-250.
  • 5Baker, P. 2013. From gay language to normative discourse: A diachronic corpus analysis of lavender linguistics conference abstracts 1994-2012 [J]. Journal of Language and Sexuality 2(2): 179-205.
  • 6Blommaert, J. 2005. Discourse: A Critical Introduction [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 7Cap, P. 2014. Applying cognitive pragmatics to critical discourse studies: A proximization analysis of three public space discourses [ J]. Journal of Pragmatics 70: 16-30.
  • 8Chilton, P. 2002. Do something! : Conceptualizing responses to attacks of 11 September 2001 [J]. Journal of Language and Politics 1(1) : 181-195.
  • 9Chilton, P. 2004. Analyzing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice [M]. London & New York : Roufledge.
  • 10Chilton, P. 2005. Missing Links in Mainstream CDA : Discourse Analysis [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部