期刊文献+

基于ICF的长期照护保险失能评估量表的编制与验证 被引量:1

Construction and verification of disability assessment scale for long-term care insurance based on ICF
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的基于ICF理论框架,对长期照护保险(简称长照险)失能评估量表进行优化和改良,并对其进行信效度验证。方法采用方便取样法,对国内长照险某试点地区共2391例老年人进行失能评估,采用项目分析、探索性和验证性因子分析、校标关联效度、Cronbach'sα系数和折半信度进行数据分析。结果项目分析中,所有条目的临界比均>3.000,条目与总分的相关性为0.460~0.899,因素负荷均>0.450,共同性除视力外均>0.200,除意识状态、视力和听力外,条目删除后α值均小于量表总Cronbach'sα系数。探索性因子分析将20个条目划分为3个维度,包括自理能力12个条目、认知能力5个条目、感官能力3个条目,累计解释变异量为76.148%。同时建立了二阶结构方程模型,模型拟合良好,条目因素负荷为0.633~0.949,各维度的收敛效度为0.509~0.809、判别效度为0.713~0.899。条目和Barthel指数总分的r值为-0.348~-0.932(P<0.001)。总量表Cronbach’sα系数和折半信度分别为0.970、0.883。结论基于ICF的新版长照险失能评估工具共包含3个维度20个条目,信效度良好,可用于评定长照险保障对象和判断其失能程度。 Objective To verify the reliability and validity of the revised disability assessment scale for long-term care insurance based on ICF theoretical framework,and to ensure the reliability and effectiveness of the tool.Methods By convenient sampling method,2391 elderly in a pilot area of long-term care insurance were evaluated.Project analysis,exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis,calibration relevance validity,Cronbach’sαcoefficient and half reliability were used to analyze the data.Results In the project analysis,the critical ratio of all items was>3.000,the correlation between items and total score was 0.460-0.899,and the factor loads were>0.450.The commonality of items were>0.200 except for vision.Except for consciousness,vision and hearing,the items’deletedαvalues were less than Cronbach’sαcoefficient of the scale.Exploratory factor analysis divided 20 items into three dimensions,including 12 items of self-care ability,5 items of cognitive ability and 3 items of sensory ability,and the cumulative explanatory variation was76.148%.At the same time,the second-order structural equation model was established.The model fitted well,the item factor loads were 0.633-0.949,the convergence validity of dimensions were 0.509-0.809,and the discrimination validity were 0.713-0.899.The r value of items and Barthel Index were from-0.348 to-0.932(P<0.001).The total scale’s Cronbach’sαcoefficient and half reliability were 0.970 and 0.883.Conclusion The scale based on ICF contains 3 dimensions and 20 entries,which has good reliability and validity,and can be used to evaluate the objects of long-term care insurance and judge the degree of disability.
作者 赵元萍 丁睿 谢红 ZHAO Yuanping;DING Rui;XIE Hong(Rizhao Health School,Rizhao 276826,China;School of Nursing,Peking University,Beijing 100191,China)
出处 《老年医学研究》 2022年第4期22-27,共6页 Geriatrics Research
关键词 失能 评估 信效度验证 ICF 长期照护保险 disability assessment reliability and validity ICF long-term care insurance
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献40

  • 1杜鹏,杨慧.中国老年残疾人口状况与康复需求[J].首都医科大学学报,2008,29(3):262-265. 被引量:47
  • 2申正付,杨秀木,贺庆功.中国老年人长期照护服务需求现状及其长期照护服务策略[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(3):841-843. 被引量:8
  • 3卢慧芳,王惠珍,高钰琳.国内外养老机构护理分级现状[J].护理研究(中旬版),2006,20(11):2920-2921. 被引量:26
  • 4和田勝.介護保険制度の政策過程[M].東京:東洋経済新報社出版社,2007:2-29.
  • 5Takako Tsutsui,Naoko Muramatsu.Care-needs certification in the long-term care insurance system of Japan[J].J Am Geriatr Soc,2005,53(3):522-527.
  • 6John Creighton Cambell,Naoki Ikegami,Mary jo Gibson.Lessons From Public Long-Term Care Insurance In Germany and Japan[J].Health affairs,2010,29(1):87-95.
  • 7中华人民共和国民政部.中华人民共和国行业标准-老年人社会福利机构基本规范(MZ008-2001)[Z].2009.
  • 8住居広士.要介護認定とは何か[M].東京:一橋出版株式会社,2004:23-36.
  • 9日本厚生劳动省老健局老人保健课.「認定調査員テキスト 2009 改訂版」の修正概要.平成21年8月[EB/OL].http://www.pref.okayama.jp/file/open/1286769774_377542_8994_144630_misc.pdf.
  • 10医療介護ニュース.「軽度化」批判で迷走―2009年重大ニュース(4)「要介護認定」,医療介護CBnews[EB/OL].https://www.cabrain.net/news/article/newsId/25680.html?freeWordSave=1.

共引文献89

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部