任务聚焦性调节情绪线索在前瞻记忆中的作用:来自ERP的证据

Focality Influences the Processing of Emotional Cues in Prospective Memory:An ERP Study

为了探究前瞻记忆任务的聚焦性是否会调节情绪线索的作用,采用聚焦(实验1)和非聚焦(实验2)任务并利用ERP测量对此进行考察。ERP结果显示,在更依赖于知觉加工的聚焦任务中,引起概念加工倾向的积极线索会干扰记忆,引起知觉加工倾向的消极线索会促进记忆。在更依赖概念加工的非聚焦任务中,积极线索促进记忆而消极线索干扰记忆。说明任务聚焦性起调节作用,且前瞻记忆的表现取决于任务需要的加工方式与个体对情绪线索的加工倾向之间的一致性。

Prospective memory(PM) refers to the ability to remember to perform a delayed intention.In a classical event-based PM paradigm,individuals engage in an ongoing task and simultaneously remember to accomplish a previously encoded intention when the PM cue(associated with that intention) occurs.Focal and non-focal PM tasks differ in the extent to which the ongoing task encourages the processing of the PM cue features.A lot of studies have focused on the influence of emotional cues on prospective memory.However,the results of these studies are contradictory and it is not clear when or how emotion influences prospective memory.By reviewing the previous studies,we found that focality of PM task is likely to be a moderator.We supposed that the performance of PM task depends on whether the processing patterns in focal and non-focal PM tasks are consistent with the ways in which individuals process emotional information.In general,negative information is associated with increased engagement of perceptual processes,and positive information leads to enhanced recruitment of conceptual processes.If the processing way of the emotional cues is consistent with that in PM task,emotional cues would facilitate the PM.If there is an inconsistency,emotional cues would impair the PM.We conducted two ERP experiments to verify this hypothesis.In both experiments,the ongoing task was a one-back working memory task using neutral,pleasant,and unpleasant pictures as stimuli.Each experiment was composed of three PM sessions,which varied for the emotional valence of the PM cue(pleasant,unpleasant,neutral).Experiment 1 was a focal task,and participants were asked to quickly press the PM key immediately after making the decision for the ongoing task whenever a pre-specified picture occurred.Therefore,perceptual processing was required in Experiment 1.Experiment 2 was a non-focal task,and conceptual processing was needed.Participants were asked to press the PM key whenever a picture belonging to the same category as it in the encoding phase occurred.The behavioral results showed that focal task performance was significantly better than non-focal task in the accuracy.However,there was no significant difference between the emotional cues and the neutral cues in the two tasks.When compared with the ERP elicited by pictures of ongoing tasks,the grand-averaged ERP elicited by PM cues were characterized by the typical modulations related to PM.More specifically,PM cues were found to elicit two positive components:the frontal positivity,which occurred between 220 and 450 ms after stimulus onset;And the parietal positivity,which occurred between 400 and 1000 ms.The early frontal positivity was considered to reflect the detection of the PM cue and was associated with more automatic processes.It was smaller for positive than neutral and negative cues in focal task.In contrast,the frontal positivity for positive cues was larger in non-focused task.The parietal positivity reflected the retrieval of the intention from memory and was associated with postretrieval monitoring processes and with coordination between PM and ongoing responses.For parietal positivity,it was smaller for negative than positive and neutral cues in focal task.In contrast,it was larger for negative cues in non-focal task.In conclusion,the results confirmed our hypothesis that the focality of PM task could modulate the effect of emotional cues on prospective memory.The influence of emotional cues on prospective memory may be critically tied to the way in which negative and positive information is processed.