摘要
在如何认识铸牢中华民族共同体意识本质属性的问题上,当前学界大致形成了民族团结、国族建构、共同体建设三种话语趋向。“民族团结话语”将铸牢中华民族共同体意识视作具有延续性与拓展性的民族团结策略,“国族建构话语”将铸牢中华民族共同体意识视作具有突破性与创新性的国族建构手段,“共同体建设话语”则将铸牢中华民族共同体意识视作具有超越性与本质性的共同体建设方案。尽管三种话语趋向之间并无根本性冲突,但彼此之间还是体现了颇为不同的学科传统和逻辑取向,在理论阐释和实践推进的侧重点上也存在着一定的差异。通过对这三种理论话语趋向进行比较分析,可以为铸牢中华民族共同体意识话语体系的构建提供有益的启示。
On the issue of how to understand the essential attributes of forging the sense of community for the Chinese nation,the current academic circle has roughly formed three discourse trends:ethnic unity,nation building and community construction.The "discourse of ethnic unity" regards forging the sense of community for the Chinese nation as an ethnic unity strategy with continuity and expansion;"discourse of nation-building" regards forging the sense of community for the Chinese nation as a breakthrough and innovative means of nation-building;"discourse of community construction" regards forging the sense of community for the Chinese nation as a transcendental and essential scheme on community construction.Although there is no fundamental conflict among the three discourse trends,they still reflect quite different disciplinary traditions and logical orientations,and there are obvious differences in the emphasis of theoretical interpretation and practical promotion.The comparative analysis of these three theoretical discourse trends can provide the useful enlightenment for the construction of the discourse system of forging the sense of community for the Chinese nation.
出处
《民族研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第4期1-12,M0002,共13页
Ethno-National Studies
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“新中国成立后各民族人口流动及深度交融的动力机制研究”(项目编号:21&ZD212)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词
中华民族共同体意识
民族团结
国族建构
共同体建设
the sense of community for the Chinese nation
ethnic unity
nation building
community construction