期刊文献+

循证教育的论争、风险与方法论审议 被引量:8

The Debate,Risk and Methodological Deliberation of Evidence-based Practice in Education
原文传递
导出
摘要 与当前我国学术界积极推介循证教育不同,国外一直存在循证教育的存废利弊之争。秉持技术取向的循证教育实践,一定意义上是将人类实践异化成为技术理性控制下的僵化程序。从教育的本质特征来看,无论是作为一种价值优先的实践,还是一种情境化的实践,教育都无法完成严格意义上的循证。教育不仅不能走向完全的循证化,而且需要在不断更迭的改革话语中对循证的诱惑保持一定的警惕。 Unlike the current active promotion of evidence-based education in Chinese academia,the debate over evidence-based education has been existed abroad.The evidencebased educational practices with technical orientation,which is completely resorted to instrumental rationality,in a certain sense alienates human practice into a rigid procedure under the control of technical rationality.From the perspective of the essential characteristics of education,whether as a value-first practice or a contextualized practice,education cannot be strictly evidence-based.Education couldn’t move toward completely evidence-based practice;however,it needs to remain somewhat wary of the lure of evidence-based practice in the ever-changing reform discourse.
作者 孙元涛 熊甸双 许建美 SUN Yuan-tao;XIONG Dian-shuang;XU Jian-mei(College of Education,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China;Jing Hengyi School of Education,Hangzhou Normal University,Hangzhou 311121,China)
出处 《高等教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第3期25-32,共8页 Journal of Higher Education
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(19YJA880069)。
关键词 循证教育 教育科学化 知识的合法性 evidence-based education scientization of education legitimacy of knowledge
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献61

  • 1田鹏颖,赵晖.论社会技术[J].自然辩证法研究,2005,21(2):62-66. 被引量:12
  • 2方刚,杨波.美国的管理式医疗及思考[J].中国医院,2005,9(12):70-74. 被引量:11
  • 3陈昌曙.《技术哲学引论》,科学出版社2000年版,第160页.
  • 4World Health Organization. (2001). The World Health Report 2000: Health systems: Improving performance. Geneva, Switzer- land : Author.
  • 5Goodheart, C. D. , Kazdin, A. E. , & Sternberg, R. G. (2006). Evidence - based psychotherapy: Where practice and research meet. Washington, DC : American Psychological Association, pp. 14 - 15.
  • 6Sackett, D. L. , Rosenberg, W. M. C. , Gray, J. A. M. , Haynes, R. B. , & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medi- cine: What it is and what it isn' t. British Medical Journal,312, 71 - 72.
  • 7Hitt, J. (2001). The year in ideas: A to Z. : Evidence- based Medicine. The New York Times, 2001.09.09.
  • 8APA Presidential Task Force on Evidence- based Practice. (2006). Evidence- based practice in psychology. American Psycholo- gist, 61 ,pp. 271 - 285.
  • 9Wampold, B. E. , Goodheart, C. D. , & Levant, R. F. (2007). Clarification and elaboration on Evidence -based practice in psy- chology. American Psychologist, 62,pp. 616 - 618.
  • 10Luborsky, L. , Diguer, L. , Seligman, D. A. , et al. (1999). The researcher~ own therapy allegiances: A " wild card" in compari- sons of treatment efficacy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6,pp. 95 - 106.

共引文献916

同被引文献145

引证文献8

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部