期刊文献+

不同咨询效果个案人际过程差异的社会行为结构分析

Structural Analysis of Social Behavior of Differences in Interpersonal Process among Cases with Differential Psychotherapeutic Outcome
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:基于社会行为结构分析,探究会谈初期好、差咨询效果个案中的人际行为及人际互动差异。方法:从国内某大学心理咨询中心选取好、差效果个案各4例,根据社会行为结构分析(structural analysis of social behav⁃ior,SASB)编码手册对人际行为和人际互动进行编码。结果:(1)好效果组咨询师有更多的协助保护,差效果组有更多的监督控制;(2)好效果组来访者的信任依赖略高于国外研究,且随着咨询的进展不断增加,而差效果组则不断波动;(3)好效果组的人际互动更稳定,咨询师逐渐以非互补的方式对来访者的互动模式进行回应。结论:有效心理咨询的互动以咨访双方的相互理解、信任为主,在维持相对稳定、正向互动的前提下,能在一定程度上以非互补的方式回应来访者适应不良的人际模式,为其他人际互动模式创造机会。 Objective:Research strategies employing Structural Analysis of Social Behavior(SASB)were demonstrated in the present study comparing good to poor outcome case,on the differences in interpersonal behavior and interaction pro⁃cess variables.Methods:Four cases with good outcomes and four cases with poor outcomes were selected from a universi⁃ty-based student counseling center in China.Interpersonal behaviors and interactions between counselors and clients were coded according to the coding manual of Structural Analysis of Social Behavior(SASB).Results:Counselor behaviors of“Nurture and Protect”were more frequent in high-change cases,while Counselor behaviors of“Watch and Control”were more frequent in low-change cases.In addition,Client behaviors of“Trust and Rely”in high-change cases were more fre⁃quent than that in foreign studies.With the process of counseling,Client behaviors of“Trust and Rely”were more frequent in high-change cases,while that behavior in low-change cases fluctuated.Moreover,the interpersonal interaction in highchange cases were relatively stable and Counselors responded in a noncomplementary manner to the client’s interpersonal evoking style.The interactions in low-change cases were unstable.Conclusion:The interpersonal interaction of effective psychotherapy is relying on mutual understanding and trust of both parties.At the same time,counseling success may re⁃quire Counselors to respond in a noncomplementary manner to the Client’s interpersonal evoking style in the context of the relatively stable and positive interaction.
作者 谌燕 吴才智 王铭 赖丽足 孙启武 CHEN Yan;WU Cai-zhi;WANG Ming;LAI Li-zu;SUN Qi-wu(Centre for Mental Health Education,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430074,China;Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior(CCNU),Ministry of Education,School of Psychology,Central China Normal University,Key Laboratory of Human Development and Mental Health of Hubei Province,Wuhan 430079,China;Center for Mental Health Education,Wuhan University of Technology,Wuhan 430070,China)
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2022年第4期761-768,801,共9页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
关键词 咨询效果 人际行为 人际互动 社会行为结构分析 Psychotherapeutic outcome Interpersonal behavior Interpersonal interaction Structural analysis of social behavior
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献81

  • 1杨宏飞.心理咨询效果评价模型初探[J].心理科学,2005,28(3):656-659. 被引量:21
  • 2陈昌惠.症状自评量表(Symptom Checklist 90,SCL-90).中国心理卫生杂志,1999,:31-35.
  • 3Lambert MJ, Morton JJ, Hatfield D, et al. Administration And Scoring Manual For The OQ-45.2 [ M ] . Outcome Questionnaire. 3ed. Stevenson, MD : American Professional Credentialing Services L. L. C, 2004:1 -28.
  • 4Lambert M J, Hawkins EJ. Measuring Outcome in Professional Practice: Considerations in Selecting and Using Brief Outcome Instruments [ J ] . Profess Psychol Res Praet, 2004, 35 (5) : 492 - 499.
  • 5Lambert M J, Whipple JL, Smart DW, et al. The effects of providing therapists with feedback on patient progress during psychotherapy : are outcomes enhanced? [ J ] Psychother Res, 2001, 11 (1): 49-68.
  • 6Harmon SC, Lambert M J, Smart DM, et al. Enhancing outcome for potential treatment failures: Therapist-client feedback and clinical support tools [ J ] . Psychother Res, 2007, 17 (4): 379-392.
  • 7刘平.Beck抑郁问卷(Beck Depression Inventory,BDI).中国心理卫生杂志,1999,:191-194.
  • 8Bauer S, Lambert M J, Nielsen SL Clinical Significance Methods: A Comparison of Statistical Techniques [ J ] . J Pers Assess, 2004, 82 (1) : 60 - 70.
  • 9Mueller RM. Construct Validity of Outcome Questionnaire: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis [J] . J Pers Assess, 1998, 70 (2): 248-262.
  • 10Richardsen AM, Martinussen M. Factorial Validity and consistency of the MBI across occupational groups in Norway [J] . IntJ Stress Manage, 2005 (12) 3: 289-297.

共引文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部