经济虐待问卷中文版在中年已婚人群中的信效度检验

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Revised Scale of Economic Abuse in Middle-aged Married Population

目的:考察经济虐待问卷(Revised Scale of Economic Abuse,SEA2)中文版在我国中年已婚人群中的适用性。方法:对587名处于在婚状态的中年人进行测试(样本1),用于项目分析和探索性因素分析;对626名处于在婚状态的中年人进行测试(样本2),用于验证性因素分析和信度分析,同时,采用婚姻质量指数量表、感知伴侣回应性量表、简版冲突决策量表进行效标关联效度检验;四周后对样本2中的139名被试(样本3)进行再次测试,考察重测信度。结果:(1)修订后的经济虐待问卷包括13个条目,探索性因素分析提取出2个因子,分别命名为经济限制和经济剥削;(2)验证性因素分析结果显示,各拟合指标良好(χ2/df=3.96,SRMR=0.031,CFI=0.982,GFI=0.953,NFI=0.977,TLI=0.974,RMSEA=0.069)。(3)在效标关联效度方面,经济虐待总分及各维度得分与婚姻质量、感知伴侣回应显著负相关,与冲突策略总分及各维度得分显著正相关。(4)问卷的Cronbachα系数为0.96,分半信度为0.93,重测信度为0.84;经济限制维度的Cronbachα系数为0.88,分半信度为0.86,重测信度为0.73;经济剥削维度的Cronbachα系数为0.97,分半信度为0.94,重测信度为0.75。结论:经济虐待问卷具有良好的信度和效度,是测量我国中年已婚人群经济虐待的有效工具。

Objective:To test the applicability of the Chinese version of Revised Scale of Economic Abuse(SEA2)in Middle-aged Married Population.Methods:A total of 587 middle-aged people in marriage(sample 1)were investigated with the first revised questionnaire for item analysis and exploratory factor analysis.Then a total of 626 middle-aged people in marriage(sample 2)were investigated with the second revised questionnaire for confirmatory factor analysis and reliability analysis.Meanwhile,the criterion-related validity was tested with Quality of Marriage Index,Perceived Partner Responsiveness Scale and Revised Conflict Tactics Scales.A total of 139 married middle-aged people(sample 3)among sample 2were retested with the second revised questionnaire after 4 weeks to test test-retest reliability.Results:(1)The revised SEA2 included 13 items,and exploratory factor analysis extracted 2 factors,which were named economic restriction and economic exploitation respectively.(2)The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fit indices wereχ2/df=3.96,SRMR=0.031,CFI=0.982,GFI=0.953,NFI=0.977,TLI=0.974,RMSEA=0.069.(3)In terms of criterion-related validity,the total score and each dimension score of economic abuse were significantly negatively correlated with marital quality and perceived partner response,and significantly positively correlated with the total score and each dimension score of conflict strategy.(4)The Cronbachαcoefficient of the total scale was 0.96,the split half reliability was 0.93,and the test-retest reliability was 0.84.The Cronbachαcoefficient of the economic restriction dimension was 0.88,the split half reliability was0.86,and the test-retest reliability was 0.73.The Cronbachαcoefficient of the economic exploitation dimension was 0.97,the split half reliability was 0.94,and the test-retest reliability was 0.75.Conclusion:The Chinese version of SEA2 has good reliability and validity,and is an effective tool to measure economic abuse between middle-aged people in China.