期刊文献+

多维错失焦虑量表在中国大学生中的信效度检验 被引量:2

Reliability and Validity Test of the Multidimensional Fear of Missing Out Scale in Chinese College Students
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:检验多维错失焦虑量表在中国大学生群体中的信度和效度。方法:共调查872名大学生,其中第一次施测334人,仅填写多维错失焦虑量表。第二次施测538人,被试分别填写多维错失焦虑量表、社交媒体使用强度量表和在线错失恐惧量表。4周后,选取94名被试进行重测。结果:多维错失焦虑量表各条目区分度优良,结构效度良好(χ2/df=3.90,RMSEA=0.07,CFI=0.93,TLI=0.91,IFI=0.93,NFI=0.91)。总量表的Cronbach’s α系数、分半和重测信度分别为0.86、0.74和0.77。该量表总分与在线错失恐惧量表(r=0.67,P<0.01)和社交媒体使用强度量表(r=0.51,P<0.01)均存在显著正相关。结论:多维错失焦虑量表中文版满足测量学标准,具有良好的信效度。 Objective:To test the reliability and validity of the Multidimensional Fear of Missing Out Scale(MFS)in Chinese college students.Methods:872 Chinese college students participated in this study.Three hundred and thirty-four participants were asked to complete the MFS for the first time.In the second test,538 participants filled in the MFS,On⁃line-specific Fear of Missing Out Scale and Social Media Use Intensity Scale.Four weeks after the Second survey,94 stu⁃dents were followed to complete the Chinese version of MFS.Results:Each item of the MFS had a good discrimination.Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the three-factor model of the scale,and the fitness indicators wereχ2/df=3.90,RMSEA=0.07,CFI=0.93,TLI=0.91,IFI=0.93,NFI=0.91.The cumulative explained variance is 60.94%.The internal consistency reliability coefficient,split-half reliability coefficient and test-retest reliability coefficient of the scale were 0.86、0.74和0.77 respectively.The total score of the MFS was positively correlated with online-specific fear of missing out(r=0.67,P<0.01)and social media use(r=0.51,P<0.01).Conclusion:The Chinese version of MFS meets the measurement standards and could be used to measure the general fear of missing out of college students.
作者 武文莉 王湃 朱丽娟 张亚利 罗增让 WU Wen-li;WANG Pai;ZHU Li-juan;ZHANG Ya-li;LUO Zeng-rang(Institute of Education,Baoji University of Arts and Sciences,Baoji 721016,China;School of Education Science,Tonghua Normal University,Tonghua 134000,China;School of Education,Suqian University,Suqian 223800,China;College of Education,Hebei Normal University,Shijiazhuang 050024,China)
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2022年第4期932-935,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 2020年度陕西省教育厅突发公共卫生安全专项科学研究计划项目(20JG001) 陕西省社科界重大理论与现实问题研究项目(2019C006)资助。
关键词 多维错失焦虑量表 信度 效度 大学生 Multidimensional fear of missing out scale Reliability Validity College students
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献70

  • 1周浩,龙立荣.共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):942-950. 被引量:3527
  • 2李文利,钱铭怡.状态特质焦虑量表中国大学生常模修订[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),1995,31(1):108-114. 被引量:204
  • 3李岩.当代大学生人际交往的特点及心理障碍分析[J].理论导刊,2006(11):94-96. 被引量:25
  • 4付建斌.状态——特质焦虑问卷构想效度的验证性因素分析[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1997,11(4):216-217. 被引量:30
  • 5Song H, Zmyslinski-Seelig A, Kim J, et al. Does Facebook make you lonely?:A meta analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014, 36:446-452.
  • 6Jelenchick LA, Eickhoff JC, Moreno MA."Facebook depression?" Social networking site use and depression in older adolescents. J Adolesc Health, 2013, 52:128-130.
  • 7Datu J, Valdez J, Datu N. Does Facebooking make us sad? Hunting relationship between Facebook useand depression among Filipino adolescents. International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology, 2012, 1(2):83-91.
  • 8Feinstein BA, Hershenberg R, Bhatia V, et al. Negative social comparison on Facebook and depressive symptoms:Rumination as a mechanism. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2013, 2(3):161-170.
  • 9Achnio AB, Apai A. Internet use, Facebook intrusion, and depression:Results of a cross-sectional study. European Psychiatry, 2015.
  • 10Labrague LJ. Facebook use and adolescents' emotional states of depression, anxiety, and stress. Health Science Journal, 2014, 1:80-89.

共引文献284

同被引文献36

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部