逻辑矛盾是西方经济学走向没落的根本原因——基于新古典学派和新奥地利学派的对比分析

Logic Contradiction Is the Main Reason for the Decline of Western Economics:A Contrastive Analysis of Neoclassical Economics and New Austrian School of Economics

西方经济学规定的现代经济学研究范式是我国经济学教学的主要内容,但是却存在着内在的矛盾性。新古典学派和新奥地利学派作为现代经济学的两大分支,其形成的历史基础分别对应着西方哲学中唯理主义与个人主义两种思潮的兴起与斗争及其对经济学发展的深刻影响。两种思潮的固有矛盾以及西方经济学研究中“泛政治化”的意识形态恐慌导致现代经济学在“政府”与“市场”关系问题讨论中存在逻辑矛盾,从而在理论与实践中呈现出明显的背离,这成为西方经济学逐步走向没落的根本原因。厘清这一原因,对增强中国特色社会主义道路的理论自信、建构中国特色社会主义政治经济学具有重要意义。

The paradigm of modern economics research set by Western economics is the main content of economics teaching in our country,but there are inherent contradictions therein.The Neoclassical School and the New Austrian School are the two main branches that constitute modern economics.The historical basis of the formation of the two corresponds to the rise and struggle of rationalism and individualism in western philosophy and the profound influence on the development of economics.The inherent contradiction between these two trends of thought and the ideological panic of"pan-politicization"in the study of western economics has led to the logical contradictions in the discussion of the relationship between"government"and"market"in modern economics,which shows obvious deviation in theory and practice——the fundamental reason for the decline of Western economics.Clarifying this reason is of great significance to enhance the theoretical confidence in the path of socialism with Chinese characteristics and construct socialist political economics with Chinese characteristics.