期刊文献+

学龄期儿童青少年近视患者生存质量研究 被引量:5

A Study of Quality of Life in School-Age Children and Adolescents with Myopia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:研究学龄期儿童青少年近视患者及其父母的生存质量并分析其相关影响因素。方法:病例对照研究。运用中小学生视力相关生存质量量表和家长生存质量调查表对335例近视患者及其家长(近视组)和110例视力正常者及其家长(对照组)进行问卷调查,同时记录患者视力、近视度数等眼部信息及个体和家庭信息。采用独立样本t检验、单因素方差分析、多元线性回归分析等分析儿童青少年近视患者的量表得分及个体家庭因素和近视情况对生存质量的影响。结果:近视组儿童青少年视力相关生存质量量表得分为95.90±8.37,明显低于对照组(104.59±5.25),差异有统计学意义(t=5.73,P<0.001)。近视组家长生存质量调查表得分为46.85±13.61,对照组得分为60.59±6.57,2组差异有统计学意义(t=6.32,P<0.001)。近视戴镜的儿童青少年生存质量在生理功能维度和情感功能维度得分明显低于近视不戴镜者(t=2.17,P=0.034;t=2.31,P=0.024)。近视戴镜患者的家长生存质量调查表得分明显低于近视不戴镜患者的家长(t=2.56,P=0.013)。多元回归分析显示家庭年总收入是影响儿童青少年近视患者生存质量总量表得分的主要因素(b=2.91,t=2.16,P=0.035),家庭年总收入、课外艺术类课时是影响儿童青少年近视患者情感能力维度的主要因素(b=1.66,t=3.39,P=0.001;b=-3.19,t=-2.46,P=0.018),课外文化类课时是影响儿童青少年近视患者视功能和身体机能维度得分的主要因素(b=-0.84,t=-2.05,P=0.045)。结论:儿童青少年近视患者及其家长的生存质量明显差于视力正常者,尤其是配戴屈光矫正眼镜者。家庭经济状况是影响儿童青少年近视患者生存质量的主要因素。关注患儿生存质量可能改善其屈光矫正的合作程度。 Objective:To evaluate the quality of life of school-age children and adolescents with myopia as well as that of their parents,and to investigate its determining factors.Methods:This is a perspective case control study.Three hundred thirty-five children and adolescents with myopia(myopic group)and 110 age-matched children with normal vision(control group)were enrolled to evaluate their quality of life using the QOL questionnaire about vision for primary and middle school students(QVSS).The quality of life of their parents was assessed using the Pedeyes Q questionnaire.Ocular history,such as visual acuity and degree of myopia as well as social demographic information were recorded.An independent samples t-test,one-way ANOVA analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were performed to analyze the variables studied.Results:The mean score of the QVSS was 95.90±8.37 in the myopic group,which was significantly lower than that in the control group which was 104.59±5.25(t=5.73,P<0.001).Parents of children in the myopic group had lower scores on the Pedeyes Q questionnaire(46.85±13.61)than those in the control group(60.59±6.57),and the difference was statistically significant(t=6.32,P<0.001).Children with myopia who wore corrective glasses had a significantly lower score in the Physiological function subscale and Emotional function subscale than those who did not wear corrective glasses(t=2.17,P=0.034;t=2.31,P=0.024).Parents of children with myopia who wore corrective glasses had a lower Pedeyes Q score than those who did not(t=2.56,P=0.013).The results of multiple regression analysis suggested that family income was the main factor correlated with the total score of the scale(b=2.91,t=2.16,P=0.035),while the results of the Emotional subscale for children with myopia was mainly affected by family income and time spent in extracurricular art class(b=1.66,t=3.39,P=0.001;b=-3.19,t=-2.46,P=0.018).Time spent in extra-curricular cultural classes dominated the visual function and physical function dimensions score(b=-0.84,t=-2.05,P=0.045).Conclusions:Children and adolescents with myopia as well as their parents had a lower quality of life than those with emmetropia.Family economic status was a predominant factor influencing quality of life in children with myopia.Paying attention to quality of life may improve the cooperation of refractive correction.
作者 王媛媛 耿鑫 钟佳杰 沈婷 周海涛 张军辉 Yuanyuan Wang;Xin Gen;Jiajie Zhong;Ting Shen;Haitao Zhou;Junhui Zhang(Department of Ophthalmology,Centre Hospital of Huzhou City,Huzhou 313000,China;Huzhou University,Huzhou 313000,China)
出处 《中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2022年第6期447-453,共7页 Chinese Journal Of Optometry Ophthalmology And Visual Science
基金 浙江省医院卫生科技项目(2021KY1089)。
关键词 生存质量 近视 量表 quality of life myopia scale
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献88

  • 1邹海东,张皙,许迅,柏林.低视力者生活质量量表中文版的研制和信度与效度考评[J].中华眼科杂志,2005,41(3):246-251. 被引量:157
  • 2王文吉.病理性近视黄斑病变的诊治[J].眼科,2006,15(4):220-222. 被引量:5
  • 3Ware JE Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al.SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide.Boston: New England Medical Center the Health Institute,1993.1-12.
  • 4Perneger TV, Leplege A, Etter JF,et al.Validation of a French-language version of the MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey(SF-36) in young healthy adults.J Clin Epidemiol, 1995,48:1051-1060.
  • 5Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D.Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines.J Clin Epidemiol, 1993,46:1417-1432.
  • 6Gandek B, Ware JE Jr.Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: the IQOLA Project approach.International Quality of Life Assessment.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:953-959.
  • 7顾杏元,金丕焕.直线回归与相关.见: 金丕焕,主编.医用统计方法.上海:上海医科大学出版社,1993.115-119.
  • 8Lam CL, Gandek B, Ren XS, et al.Tests of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the Chinese(HK) version of the SF-36 Health Survey.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:1139-1147.
  • 9Ren XS, Amick B 3rd, Zhou L, et al.Translation and psychometric evaluation of a Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey in the United States.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:1129-1138.
  • 10Till JE, Osoba D, Pater JL, et al.Research on health-related quality of life: dissemination into practical applications.Qual Life Res, 1994,3:279-283.

共引文献2240

同被引文献47

引证文献5

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部