期刊文献+

密云水库走马庄副坝测压管水位滞时分析 被引量:1

Analysis of water level stagnation of pressure gauge in Zoumazhuang secondary dam of Miyun Reservoir
原文传递
导出
摘要 在资料分析时需要首先估计测压管滞后时间。选取自动化系统中走马庄副坝2021年和2013年最高库水位期间遥测值,做滞时分析,得出高水位运行期间滞后时间明显缩短。利用考虑滞时影响的测压管水位与库水位建立线性回归模型,得出各测压管水位与库水位均显著相关,与大坝的渗径、渗透系数以及大坝基础处理有关。分析结果对评价大坝施工质量、判断坝体安全运行状态具有非常重要现实意义。 It is necessary to first estimate the pressure tube lag time during data analysis. The telemetry data corresponding to the highest reservoir water level of Zoumazhuang Secondary Dam in 2021 and 2013 in the automation system were selected for lag time analysis, and it is concluded that the pressure tube lag time was shortened obviously at high water. A linear regression model was established between the pressure gauge water level and the reservoir water level considering the influence of hysteresis. The results show that each piezometric level is significantly correlated with the reservoir water level. It is considered that this has a great relationship with the seepage diameter, permeability coefficient and foundation treatment of the dam. The analysis results are of great practical significance for evaluating the dam construction quality and judging the safe operation state of the dam body.
作者 高海伶 苏赫 段波 赵旭 赵红国 赵梦舟 GAO Hailing;SU He;DUAN Bo;ZHAO Xu;ZHAO Hongguo;ZHAO Mengzhou(Beijing Miyun Reservoir Management Office,Beijing 101512,China;Beijing Jingmi Water Diversion Management Office,Beijing 101400,China)
出处 《北京水务》 2022年第4期58-61,共4页 Beijing Water
关键词 密云水库 走马庄副坝 滞时分析 遥测值 回归模型 Miyun Reservoir Zoumazhuang Secondary Dam the hysteresis analysis telemetry values regression model
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献14

  • 1SL60-94.土石坝安全监测技术规范[S].[S].,..
  • 2Vaughan P R.A note on sealing piezometers in boreholes[J].Géotechnique,1969,19(3):405-413.
  • 3McKenna G T.Grouted-in installation of piezometers in boreholes[J].Canadian Geotechnical Journal,1995,32(2):355-363.
  • 4Chiasson P.Methods of interpretation of borehole falling-head tests performed in compacted clay liners[J].Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2005,42(1):79-90.
  • 5Rowe R K,Nadarajah P.Evaluation of the hydraulic conductivity of aquitards[J].Canadian Geotechnical Journal,1993,30(5):781-800.
  • 6Dixon N,Bromhead E N.Depth-dependent permeability in London Clay measured using standpipe piezometer equilibration data[J].Géotechnique,1999,49(5):651-660.
  • 7Hvorslev M J.Time lag and soil permeability in ground-water observations[R].Waterways Experiment Station,Engineer Research and Development Center,the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,Vicksburg,Mississippi:Bulletin,1951.
  • 8Gibson R E.An analysis of system flexibility and its effect on time-lag in pore-water pressure measurements[J].Géotechnique,1963,13(1):1-11.
  • 9Brand E W,Premchitt J.Response characteristics of cylindrical piezometers[J].Géotechnique,1982,32(3):203-216.
  • 10Chapuis R P.Shape factors for permeability tests in boreholes and piezometers[J].Ground Water,1989,27(5):647-654.

共引文献12

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部