期刊文献+

晚期癌症患者安宁疗护态度量表的汉化及信效度分析 被引量:10

Translation of Palliative Care Attitudes Scale and Its Reliability and Validity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对安宁疗护态度量表(Palliative Care Attitudes Scale,PCAS-9)进行汉化,并检验其信效度。方法通过Brislin模型汉化量表,经过文化调适后,选取440名癌症晚期患者进行测试,检验量表的信度效度。结果中文版安宁疗护态度量表共有9个条目,探索性因子分析提取3个公因子,累积方差贡献率为81.518%。验证性因子分析显示模型的各项指标均达到标准,模型拟合良好。总量表的Cronbachα系数为0.863,各个分量表的Cronbachα系数分别为0.875、0.901、0.872;2周后量表总的重测信度为0.862,各个分量表的重测信度为0.762、0.747、0.910。结论中文版安宁疗护态度量表具有较好的信效度,可用于测评晚期癌症患者对安宁疗护的态度。 Objective To translate the Palliative Care Attitudes Scale(PCAS-9)and to test the reliability and validity.Methods The PCAS-9 was translated according to the Brislin translation model.After cultural adjustment,440 patients with advanced cancer were selected to complete the scale to test the reliability and validity.Results The Chinese version of the scale consisted of 9 items.Exploratory factor analysis was used to extract three common factors,and the factor cumulative variance contribution rate was 81.518%.Confirmatory factor analysis showed that all the indicators of the model reached the criteria and the model fitted well.The Cronbach’sαcoefficient of the total scale was 0.863,and the Cronbach’sαcoefficient of each subscale 0.875,0.901,and 0.872,respectively.After 2 weeks,the total retest reliability of the scale was 0.862,and the retest reliability of each subscale was 0.762,0.747,and 0.910 respectively.Conclusion The Chinese version of PCAS-9 had good reliability and validity and could be used to evaluate the attitudes toward palliative care in advanced cancer patients.
作者 刘凯莉 罗艳艳 姚桂英 朱智玲 郭华 杜诣深 秦立伟 吴慧敏 李佳波 LIU Kai-li;LUO Yan-yan;YAO Gui-ying;ZHU Zhi-ling;GUO Hua;DU Yi-shen;QIN Li-wei;WU Hui-min;LI Jia-bo(School of Nursing,Xinxiang Medical University,Xinxiang 453000,China;Dept.of Nursing Administration,Xinxiang Central Hospital,Xinxiang 453000,China;Dept.of Oncology,Xinxiang Central Hospital,Xinxiang 453000,China)
出处 《护理学报》 北大核心 2022年第16期11-16,共6页 Journal of Nursing(China)
基金 2021年河南省研究生教育改革与质量提升工程项目(YJS2021KC23)。
关键词 晚期癌症患者 安宁疗护态度量表 信度 效度 patient with advanced cancer Palliative Care Attitudes Scale reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献64

  • 1李强.社会支持与个体心理健康[J].天津社会科学,1998(1):66-69. 被引量:427
  • 2蒋艳 ,沈宁 ,邹树芳 .护理研究中量表研制及测量学特征的评定方法[J].中华护理教育,2005,2(4):174-176. 被引量:78
  • 3Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518.
  • 4Lindell MK,Brandt CJ,Whitney DJ.A revised index of interrateragreement for multi-item ratings of a single target[J].Appl PsycholMeasurem,1999,23(2):127–135.
  • 5Lawshe CH.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Personne Psychol,1975,28(4):563–575.
  • 6Hambleton RK,Swaminathan H,Algina J,et al.Criterion-referencedtesting and measurement:Review of technical issues anddevelopments[J].Rev Educat Res,1978,48(1):11–22.
  • 7Martuza VR.Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn andBacon,1977:275–293.
  • 8Lynn MR.Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nursing Res,1986,35(6):382–385.
  • 9Davis LL.Instrument review:Getting the most from your panel ofexperts[J].Appl Nurs Res,1992,5(4):194–197.
  • 10Polit DF,Beck CT.The content validity index:are you sure youknow what’s being reported?critique and recommendations[J].Res Nurs Health,2006,29(5):489–497.

共引文献1010

同被引文献88

引证文献10

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部