期刊文献+

行政处罚中对伪造、篡改病历的认定 被引量:2

Identification of forging and tampering of medical records in administrative penalty
原文传递
导出
摘要 伪造病历与篡改病历都是含有特定目的的主观故意行为,二者不是排斥关系,都是未按规定填(书)写病历的特殊情形。行政处罚中对伪造、篡改病历的认定,不能简单照搬民事规定中有无“实质性影响”的原则;行政认定重在考察行为性质,行为是否造成病历真伪不明的结果不是认定的必要条件。根据制作病历的主体、方式、内容、目的,可对是否构成伪造、篡改作出认定。对目的的认定是一个证据运用或推定的过程。 Forging medical records and tampering with medical records are subjective and intentional acts with specific purposes. They are not exclusive relations. They are special situations in which medical records are not filled in or written according to regulations. The identification of forging and tampering of medical records in administrative penalty can not simply copy the principle of whether there is "substantial impact" in civil provisions. Administrative identification pays more attention to the nature of action. Whethe the action causes the result of unclear authenticity of medical records is not a necessary condition for identification. According to the subject, method, content and purpose of making medical records, it can be determined whether it constitutes forgery and tampering. The indirect proof of purpose is a problem of application or presumption of evidence.
作者 张红升 张文静 吴国荣 余占洪 Zhang Hongsheng;Zhang Wenjing;Wu Guorong;Yu Zhanhong(Shenzhen Guangming District Health Ins pection Institute,Shenzhen,Guangdong 518132,China;The First Hospital of Tsinghua University,Beijing 100016,China;Guangdong Shenbao Law Firm,Shenzhen,Guangdong 518101,China;University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Shenzhen Hospital,Shenzhen,Guangdong 518107,China)
出处 《中国卫生法制》 2022年第5期41-47,共7页 China Health Law
关键词 行政处罚 病历 伪造 篡改 未按规定填写 Administrative penalty Medical record Forge Tamper Not fill in to write according to regulations
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献76

共引文献294

同被引文献23

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部