卵巢肿瘤患者接受优质护理干预对焦虑抑郁心理的缓解作用

Relief Effect of High-quality Nursing Intervention on Anxiety and Depression in Patients with Ovarian Tumor

目的:探析卵巢肿瘤患者采取优质护理干预的临床效果。方法:选取2019年1月—2021年1月河南省人民医院收治的100例卵巢肿瘤患者作为研究对象,运用双盲法分为参照组和试验组,每组各50例。参照组给予常规护理,试验组在常规护理基础上给予优质护理,对比两组患者效果,如焦虑、抑郁情绪与满意度等。结果:两组患者干预前焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分比较,差异无统计学意义(t=0.267、0.041,P>0.05)。干预后,试验组和参照组SAS、SDS评分比较,差异有统计学意义(t=5.653、7.774,P<0.05)。试验组满意度高于参照组,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=6.061,P<0.05)。试验组躯体功能相对于参照组明显提高,差异有统计学意义(t=13.610,P<0.05),心理能力相对于参照组明显提高,差异有统计学意义(t=12.536,P<0.05),社会能力相对于参照组明显提高,差异有统计学意义(t=11.207,P<0.05),总健康活力相对于参照组明显提高,差异有统计学意义(t=10.673,P<0.05)。结论:卵巢肿瘤患者采取优质护理干预可获理想效果,有益于改善其焦虑、抑郁等负性情绪,提高护理满意度,优化生活质量。

Objective: To explore the clinical effects of high-quality nursing interventions for patients with ovarian tumors.Methods: From January 2019 to January 2021, 100 patients with ovarian tumors admitted to the hospital were selected as the research subjects, and were divided into two groups by double-blind method, with 50 cases in each group. The reference group was given routine nursing, and the experimental group was given high-quality nursing on basic of the rontine nursing. The effects of the two groups of patients, such as anxiety, depression and satisfaction, were compared. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the self-rating anxiety scale(SAS) and self-rating depression scale(SDS) between the two groups before intervention(t=0.267, 0.041, P>0.05). After intervention, there was a statistically significant difference in SAS and SDS between the experimental group and the reference group(t=5.653, 7.774, P<0.05). The satisfaction of the experimental group was higher than that of the reference group, and the difference was statistically significant(χ^(2)=6.061, P<0.05). Compared with the reference group, the physical function of the experimental group was significantly improved, and the difference was statistically significant(t=13.610, P<0.05). Compared with the reference group, the psychological ability of the experimental group was significantly improved, and the difference was statistically significant(t=12.536, P<0.05). Compared with the reference group, the social ability of the experimental group had a significant improvement advantage, and the difference was statistically significant(t=11.207, P<0.05). Compared with the reference group, the total health vitality of the experimental group was significantly improved, and the difference was statistically significant(t=10.673, P<0.05). Conclusion: The high-quality nursing intervention for patients with ovarian tumors can achieve ideal results, which are beneficial to improve their anxiety, depression and other negative emotions, improve nursing satisfaction, and optimize the quality of life.