行政协议的范围界定问题研究

RESEARCH ON THE SCOPE DEFINITION OF ADMINISTRATIVE AGREEMENT

行政协议作为一种更为缓和的行政权行使方式,在政府从“干预型”向“服务型”转化的过程中得到越来越广泛的使用。最高法颁布的《关于审理行政协议案件若干问题的规定》中对行政协议范围界定模糊,使得地方规定中对行政协议认定标准不一致,司法实践中行政协议认定结果有偏差。行政协议的范围界定问题需要立法上依反向排除来限定行政协议的范围、地方上明确行政协议的类型、司法上法官辨明公共服务,各个阶段相互配合来解决。

As a more moderate way of exercising administrative power,administrative agreements have been used more and more widely in the process of the government's transformation from an“intervention type”to a“service type”.The Supreme Law promulgated the“Regulations on Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Administrative Agreement Cases”which vaguely defined the scope of administrative agreements,which made local regulations inconsistent and the identification of administrative agreements in judicial practice was biased.The problem of defining the scope of administrative agreements requires legislative reverse exclusion to limit the scope of administrative agreements,local clarification of the types of administrative agreements,judicial judges to identify public services,and mutual cooperation at all stages to determine the scope of administrative agreements.