摘要
20世纪二三十年代,作为诗人、评论家的霍达谢维奇与阿达莫维奇持续了10年的论战,成为巴黎俄侨诗歌界最重要的公共事件。两位评论家论战的主要内容包括侨民诗歌的评价标准、俄罗斯传统诗歌的继承、年轻一代侨民诗人的写作启蒙等,其中,以普希金为代表的经典文学样式和以“巴黎音调”为代表的新诗歌风貌成为论辩最主要的焦点。从本质上看,“十年论战”反映了俄罗斯侨民诗人普遍存在的创作焦虑和在身份认同上面临的现实困境,同时也折射出20世纪二三十年代欧洲的总体文化危机。
In the 1920s and 1930s,the debate between the poet and critic Khodasevich and Adamovich lasted for ten years,which constituted the most important public event in the Russian poetry circle of Paris.The main content of the debate between the two critics included the evaluation of emigre poetry,the inheritance of traditional Russian poetry,the writing enlightenment of the younger generation of emigre poets,etc.,and the classic literary style represented by Pushkin and the new poetry represented by the“Paris Tone”style have become the main focus of debate.In essence,the ten-year controversy refl ects the general creative anxiety of the emigre poets and the realistic dilemma they faced in terms of identity.It also reflects the overall cultural crisis in Europe in the 1920s and 1930s.
作者
张猛
Zhang Meng(Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
出处
《北京第二外国语学院学报》
2022年第4期108-122,共15页
Journal of Beijing International Studies University
关键词
俄罗斯侨民文学
侨民诗歌
巴黎音调
霍达谢维奇
阿达莫维奇
文学性
十年论战
经典文学
Russian emigre literature
Russian emigre poetry
Pairs Tone
Khodasevich
Adamovich
literary
ten years of controversy
classical literature