Impact of epinephrine volume on further bleeding due to high-risk peptic ulcer disease in the combination therapy era

BACKGROUND In monotherapy studies for bleeding peptic ulcers,large volumes of epinephrine were associated with a reduction in rebleeding.However,the impact of epinephrine volume in patients treated with combination endoscopic therapy remains unclear.AIM To assess whether epinephrine volume was associated with bleeding outcomes in individuals who also received endoscopic thermal therapy and/or clipping.METHODS Data from 132 patients with Forrest class Ia,Ib,and IIa peptic ulcers were reviewed.The primary outcome was further bleeding at 7 d;secondary outcomes included further bleeding at 30 d,need for additional therapeutic interventions,post-endoscopy blood transfusions,and 30-day mortality.Logistic and linear regression and Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed.RESULTS There was no association between epinephrine volume and all primary and secondary outcomes in multivariable analyses.Increased odds for further bleeding at 7 d occurred in patients with elevated creatinine values(aOR 1.96,95%CI 1.30-3.20;P<0.01)or hypotension requiring vasopressors(aOR 6.34,95%CI 1.87-25.52;P<0.01).Both factors were also associated with all secondary outcomes.CONCLUSION Epinephrine maintains an important role in the management of bleeding ulcers,but large volumes up to a range of 10-20 mL are not associated with improved bleeding outcomes among individuals receiving combination endoscopic therapy.Further bleeding is primarily associated with patient factors that likely cannot be overcome by increased volumes of epinephrine.However,in carefully-selected cases where ulcer location or size pose therapeutic challenges or when additional modalities are unavailable,it is conceivable that increased volumes of epinephrine may still be beneficial.