期刊文献+

GHS-R1a对高脂饮食小鼠糖代谢及腹部脂肪影响

EFFECT OF GROWTH HORMONE SECRETAGOGUE RECEPTOR 1A ON GLUCOSE METABOLISM AND ABDOMINAL FAT IN MICE FED WITH HIGH-FAT DIET
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨生长激素促分泌素受体(GHS-R)1a对高脂饮食小鼠体质量、腹部脂肪组织及糖代谢的影响。方法选取6周龄野生型(WT)雌性C57BL/6小鼠10只,随机分为普通饮食组(WTRD组,n=5)和高脂饮食组(WT HFD组,n=5);选取6周龄GHS-R1a基因敲除(KO)雌性C57BL/6小鼠10只,随机分为普通饮食组(KORD组,n=6)和高脂饮食组(KO HFD组,n=4)。于6~15周龄每周测量体质量;于16周龄时行腹腔葡萄糖耐量试验(IPGTT),分别于注射后0、15、30、60、120min行尾静脉取血测定血糖;于17周龄时将小鼠安乐死后取出肝脏和腹内白色脂肪组织并称质量,制备石蜡切片观察腹内脂肪病理变化。结果对各组小鼠15周龄较6周龄体质量变化量进行比较,WTHFD组明显高于WTRD组(F=6.99,P<0.05),而KO HFD组与KORD组差异无显著性(P>0.05)。17周龄时,WT HFD组小鼠腹内脂肪质量、腹内脂肪比例均显著大于KO HFD组(F=4.79、6.39,P<0.05),而WTRD组与KORD组比较差异均无显著性(P>0.05)。组织学观察显示,KO HFD组小鼠脂肪细胞面积较WT HFD组小(F=12.30,P<0.01)。WT HFD组小鼠空腹血糖水平显著高于KO HFD组(P<0.01),空腹胰岛素水平也显著高于KO HFD组(F=26.88,P<0.01)。对各组小鼠IPGTT曲线下面积(AUC)进行比较,WT HFD组明显高于KO HFD组(F=6.40,P<0.05)。结论小鼠GHS-R1a敲除可以抵抗高脂饮食诱导的肥胖、腹部脂肪堆积,改善胰岛素敏感性和糖耐量异常。 Objective To investigate the effect of growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1a(GHS-R1a)on the body weight,abdominal adipose tissue,and glucose metabolism of mice fed high-fat diet.Methods Ten wild-type(WT)female C57BL/6 mice,aged 6 weeks,were selected and randomly divided into regular diet group(WT RD with 5 mice)and high-fat diet group(WT HFD with 5 mice);10 female C57BL/6 mice withGHS-R1a gene knockout(KO),aged 6 weeks,were randomly divided into regular diet group(KO RD group with 6 mice)and high-fat diet group(KO HFD group with 4 mice).Body weight was measured on a weekly basis from the age of 6-15 weeks;the intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test(IPGTT)was performed at the age of 16 weeks,and blood samples were collected via the caudal vein at 0,15,30,60,and 120 min after injection to measure blood glucose;after the mice were euthanized at the age of 17 weeks,the liver and the white abdominal adipose tissue were collec-ted and weighed,and paraffin sections were used to observe the pathological changes of abdominal adipose tissue.Results The change in body weight from the age of 6 weeks to 15 weeks was compared between groups,and the WT HFD group had a significantly higher body weight than the WT RD group(F=6.99,P<0.05),while there was no significant difference between the KO HFD group and the KO RD group(P>0.05).At the age of 17 weeks,the WT HFD group had significantly higher weight and proportion of intra-abdominal fat than the KO HFD group(F=4.79,6.39;P<0.05),but there was no significant difference between the WT RD group and the KO RD group(P>0.05).Histological analysis showed that the KO HFD group had a significantly smaller adipocyte area than the WT HFD group(F=12.30,P<0.01).Compared with the KO HFD group,the WT HFD group had significantly higher levels of fasting blood glucose(P<0.01)and fasting insulin(F=26.88,P<0.01).The area under the IPGTT curve was compared between groups,and the WT HFD group had a significantly larger area than the KO HFD group(F=6.40,P<0.05).Conclusion GHS-R1a knockout in mice can resist obesity and abdominal fat accumulation induced by high-fat diet and improve insulin sensitivity and abnormal glucose tolerance.
作者 怀宙阳 董冰子 邓玉杰 尹艺蓉 信芳杰 李成乾 HUAI Zhouyang;DONG Bingzi;DENG Yujie;YIN Yirong;XIN Fangjie;LI Chengqian(Health Department,Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University,Yantai 264000,China)
出处 《青岛大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 2022年第4期540-544,共5页 Journal of Qingdao University(Medical Sciences)
基金 中国博士后课题面上项目(2018M640615) 青岛大学附属医院临床医学+X科研项目(3387)。
关键词 受体 胃促生长素 膳食 高脂 肥胖 腹部 腹部脂肪 葡萄糖代谢障碍 小鼠 近交C57BL receptors,Ghrelin diet,high-fat obesity,abdominal abdominal fat glucose metabolism disorders mice inbred C57BL
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献21

  • 1LeungPK, ChowKB, LauPN, etal. The truncated ghrelin receptor polypeptide (GHS Rlb) acts as a dominant negative mutant of the ghrelin receptor [J]. Cell Signal, 2007; 19(5) : 1011
  • 2Ghigo E, Broglio F, Arvat E, et al. Ghrelin: more than a natural GH secretagogue and/or an orexigenic factor [J]. Clin En docrinol (Oxf), 2005; 62(1) : 1
  • 3Howard AD, Feighner SD, Cully DF, et al. A receptor in pituitary and hypothalamus that functions in growth hormone release [J]. Science, 1996; 273(5277) :974
  • 4Dixit VD, Taub DD. Ghrelin and immunity: a young player in an old field [J]. ExpGerontol, 2005; 40(11):900
  • 5Locatelli V, Bresciani E, Bulgarelli I, et al. Ghrelin in gastroenteric pathophysiology [J]. J Endocrinol Invest, 2005; 28 (9) : 843
  • 6Kitazawa T, De Smet B, Verbeke K, et al. Gastric motor effects of peptide and non-peptide ghrelin agonists in mice in vi vo and in vitro [J]. Gut, 2005; 54(8):1078
  • 7Peeters TL. Ghrelin: a new player in the control of gastrointestinal functions [J]. Gut, 2005; 54(11):1638
  • 8Fujino K, Inui A, Asakawa A, et al. Ghrelin induces fasted motor activity of the gastrointestinal tract in conscious fed rats [J]. J Physiol, 2003,550(Pt 1):227
  • 9Tack J, Depoortere I, Bisschops R, et al. Influence of ghrelin on interdigestive gastrointestinal motility in humans [J]. Gut, 2006; 55(3):327
  • 10Dornonville de la Cour C, Lindstrom E, Norlen P, et al. Ghrelin stimulates gastric emptying but is without effect on acid secretion and gastric endocrine cells [J]. Regul Pept, 2004; 120(1--3):23

共引文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部